2009
DOI: 10.1039/b814204a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunable immunonanoparticle binding to cancer cells: thermodynamic analysis of targeted drug delivery vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although multivalent interactions between a NP and the targeted cell surface can significantly enhance the avidity of a NP-cell surface interaction, the decision to engineer multivalency into a NP formulation still requires consideration of NP size, ligand density, ligand size and the density/distribution of receptors on the targeted cell surface [160].…”
Section: Optimization Of Ligand Density and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although multivalent interactions between a NP and the targeted cell surface can significantly enhance the avidity of a NP-cell surface interaction, the decision to engineer multivalency into a NP formulation still requires consideration of NP size, ligand density, ligand size and the density/distribution of receptors on the targeted cell surface [160].…”
Section: Optimization Of Ligand Density and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haun and Hammer [43] investigated the kinetic rate constants of attachment and detachment of 210 nm nanocarriers as a function of receptor density, ligand density on surface, and flow shear rate, and identified a time dependence of the detachment rate due to multivalent binding. Ho et al [123] studied the effect of antibody surface coverage on equilibrium binding constants by measuring fractional coverage of bound nanocarriers (80 nm in diameter) as a function of carrier concentrations; by fitting their experimental data, they observed linear dependence of K α on antibody surface coverage, leading them to conclude that the system was dominated by monovalent interactions. Immunotargeting of liposomes to activated vascular endothelial cells has been advocated as a strategy for site-selective delivery in the cardiovascular system by Spragg et al [34].…”
Section: Endothelial Target Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this method, the authors were able to quantify binding strength, allowing them to better understand whether Nanocarriers were bound by monovalent or multivalent interactions. The binding data for each formulation were fitted to Langmuir isotherms, and based on the theory presented, it was concluded that the system studied behaved in a manner consistent with monovalent binding [123]. Liu et al [89] developed a computational model to calculate the absolute binding affinities between functionalized nanocarriers and the endothelial cell surface.…”
Section: Endothelial Target Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HER-2 targeting has been achieved by targeted nanoparticles as well as fluorophore-conjugated antibodies [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Our nanoparticle formulation provides a new approach which has proven to effectively target and selectively label ovarian cancer cells with high-HER-2 expression levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%