13th International Crimean Conference Microwave and Telecommunication Technology, 2003. CriMiCo 2003. 2003
DOI: 10.1109/crmico.2003.158898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunable microwave filters based on ferroelectric capacitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OIP3 results were presented for this technology in Ka-band. To the best of our knowledge, these results are the best loss results for tunable ferroelectric filters [8]- [11] in Ka-band and at room temperature. Also, the performances are better than those of the K-Band filters [6], [7] working at cryogenic temperatures.…”
Section: Oip3 Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…OIP3 results were presented for this technology in Ka-band. To the best of our knowledge, these results are the best loss results for tunable ferroelectric filters [8]- [11] in Ka-band and at room temperature. Also, the performances are better than those of the K-Band filters [6], [7] working at cryogenic temperatures.…”
Section: Oip3 Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…F ERROELECTRIC materials have become promising to provide electronically tunable microwave components for wireless front-end applications such as phase-shifters, antennas, oscillators and bandpass filters (BPF) [1]- [8]. Microwave filters, used in transceivers, belong to these fundamental circuits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of microwave frequency applications, performances in terms of frequency tunability and insertion loss are still not satisfactory. Again, most of the published papers concern BPFs utilizing localized element BST varactors [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and only few are directly fabricated on BST layers [17][18][19]. In general, both circuit architectures suffer from high insertion losses and bandwidth variation with tuning as the tuning of resonance and interresonator coupling should be made in a synchronized way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, both circuit architectures suffer from high insertion losses and bandwidth variation with tuning as the tuning of resonance and interresonator coupling should be made in a synchronized way. The first ones generally present higher tuning capabilities at low voltages with better insertion losses: up to 22% at 30 V with 5.4 to 3.3 dB insertion loss for the state-of-theart varactor-based BPF [14] compared to 7.7% at 150 V with 14.8 to 7.8 dB insertion loss for the best BST layer-based BPF [18]. However, varactor-based BPFs do not necessarily present better overall characteristics than fully distributed devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a good alternative to switchable filter banks by offering smaller size and lower power consumption and requiring a simpler and lower-cost process. Tunable filters for wireless front-end applications have already been demonstrated using RF-MEMS switches (Palego et al, 2008;Park & Rebeiz, 2008), ferroelectric capacitors (Pleskachev & Vendik, 2004;Papapolymerou et al, 2006;Feng et al, 2009), and PIN diodes (Rauscher, 2003). The performance of these reconfigurable circuits mainly relies on these tunable components, and frequency reconfigurable filters are particularly sensitive to loss.…”
Section: Interest Of Electronically Tunable Ferroelectric Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%