2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning oxidation level, electrical conductance and band gap structure on graphene sheets by a cyclic atomic layer reduction technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19] For the CNS and CNT samples, distinct peaks appear at ~26°and ~42°, corresponding to the (002) and (100) plane diffraction of the graphitic structure, respectively. [20] The (002) interplane distances of CNSs and CNTs calculated using Bragg's law are ~0.345 and ~0.338 nm, respectively, which are close to that of ideal ChemSusChem graphite (i.e., 0.335 nm). [21] Figure S2 shows the Raman spectra of the carbon materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[19] For the CNS and CNT samples, distinct peaks appear at ~26°and ~42°, corresponding to the (002) and (100) plane diffraction of the graphitic structure, respectively. [20] The (002) interplane distances of CNSs and CNTs calculated using Bragg's law are ~0.345 and ~0.338 nm, respectively, which are close to that of ideal ChemSusChem graphite (i.e., 0.335 nm). [21] Figure S2 shows the Raman spectra of the carbon materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…According to the XRD data, AC exhibits a featureless pattern, indicating low crystallinity [19] . For the CNS and CNT samples, distinct peaks appear at ∼26° and ∼42°, corresponding to the (002) and (100) plane diffraction of the graphitic structure, respectively [20] . The (002) interplane distances of CNSs and CNTs calculated using Bragg's law are ∼0.345 and ∼0.338 nm, respectively, which are close to that of ideal graphite (i.e., 0.335 nm) [21] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, an energy band gap ( E g ) was used to evaluate the electronic conductivity of the catalytic electrodes. [ 48 ] As shown in Figure S28, Supporting Information, the CoNiCH (0.663 eV) exhibited a lower E g than the Cu(OH) 2 (0.899 eV), CoCH (1.623 eV), and NiCH (1.352 eV), displaying an essence of optimal electron transfer in the CoNiCH. Therefore, the DFT analysis provided an essential comprehension of the CoNiCH as a high‐performance electrocatalyst for OER.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functionalization using the chemical rationale may help fine-tune the nature and magnitude of the gap required for various electronic, optical, and catalytic applications. With the advent of atomic layer deposition (ALD) processes , that help engineer nanoscale chemisorption and desorption, tactful disruption of π-electron delocalization by saturating a few sp 2 carbon atoms appears to be more promising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%