Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301) 2002
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2002.1024469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning rules for passivity-preserving controllers

Abstract: Nonlinear Passivity-based control (PBC) algorithms for power converters have proven to be an interesting alternative for other, mostly linear, control techniques. The control objective is usually achieved through an energy reshaping process and by injecting damping to modify the dissipation structure of the system. However, a key question that arises during the implementation of the controller is how to tune the various parameters. From previous work we know that a PBC controller forces the closed-loop dynamic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This directly suggests application of similar controller design techniques as developed for PCH and Lagrangian systems with some additional advantages. For example, in contrast to the Lagrangian or Hamiltonian framework, a passivity-based feedback controller (see Jeltsema and Scherpen (2002) and Ortega, Jeltsema, and Scherpen (2002) for some ÿrst results regarding control in the BM framework) based on the BM equations requires state measurements in terms of currents and voltages directly. This is a major advantage since they correspond to the commonly used and available sensors because no complicated and performance degrading (due to unknown parameters) state transformations have to be made.…”
Section: Inclusion Of Switchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This directly suggests application of similar controller design techniques as developed for PCH and Lagrangian systems with some additional advantages. For example, in contrast to the Lagrangian or Hamiltonian framework, a passivity-based feedback controller (see Jeltsema and Scherpen (2002) and Ortega, Jeltsema, and Scherpen (2002) for some ÿrst results regarding control in the BM framework) based on the BM equations requires state measurements in terms of currents and voltages directly. This is a major advantage since they correspond to the commonly used and available sensors because no complicated and performance degrading (due to unknown parameters) state transformations have to be made.…”
Section: Inclusion Of Switchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantage of using the mixed potential function is that we can apply Brayton and Moser's stability criteria to investigate the stability of the equilibrium points of a mechanical system or use it to find tuning rules for feedback controllers, like the passivity-based control algorithms [5]. Also, in the proposed framework we are able to apply the recently developed novel nonlinear control technique, called Power Shaping, as proposed in [7], to the class of mechanical systems considered here.…”
Section: This Is Just the Well-known Euler-lagrange Equation With Lagmentioning
confidence: 99%