2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.052502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning superconductivity in Eu(Fe0.81Co0.19)2As

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, for H ⊥ c, T c (H ) rapidly decreases below H cr and levels off at a value of 1.07 K at higher fields. The relative decrease of T c (H ) for this field configuration is equal to 64%, and is substantially larger than that for H c. Very recently, we pointed out that the drop in T c (H ) of Eu(Fe 0.81 Co 0.19 ) 2 As 2 is associated with a weakness of the orbital pair-breaking effect [30]. We suggested that this phenomenon would account for FI-SC in Eu(Fe 0.81 Co 0.19 ) 2 As 2 .…”
Section: Electron Transport Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…On the other hand, for H ⊥ c, T c (H ) rapidly decreases below H cr and levels off at a value of 1.07 K at higher fields. The relative decrease of T c (H ) for this field configuration is equal to 64%, and is substantially larger than that for H c. Very recently, we pointed out that the drop in T c (H ) of Eu(Fe 0.81 Co 0.19 ) 2 As 2 is associated with a weakness of the orbital pair-breaking effect [30]. We suggested that this phenomenon would account for FI-SC in Eu(Fe 0.81 Co 0.19 ) 2 As 2 .…”
Section: Electron Transport Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…17,18 To the best of our knowledge, so far the zero-resistivity state in Eu(Fe 1−x Co x ) 2 As 2 was only realized in the single crystals grown using Sn as the flux, but with relatively lower superconducting transition temperature (T sc ∼ 10 K). [19][20][21][22] In addition, the SDW order in the self-flux-grown crystals was found to be suppressed much faster upon Co doping than that in the Sn-flux-grown crystals. 17,20 It is quite clear that the physical properties of the Eu(Fe 1−x Co x ) 2 As 2 single crystals strongly depend on the growth techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…and cobalt-doping [8,9,[24][25][26][27] studies in EuFe 2 As 2 . In some cases, zero resistance could not be achieved down to 2 K [5,8,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, the Eu 2+ spins turn to the c-axis at low temperatures [14,15], which leads to FM [7, 16, 17], helimagnetism [8] or spin canting [18,19], all with significant ferromagnetic component. The coexistence of SC and FM was later confirmed and further studied by various experimental techniques [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]; nevertheless, there were different explanations for the Eu-spin ordering [6,[28][29][30], questioning the existence of FMSCs in the EuFe 2 As 2 -related system.Owing to the delicate interplay between SC and Eu-spin ordering, the superconducting and magnetic transitions of the above possible FMSCs are rather subtle, and the chemical doping in EuFe 2 As 2 with different elements may be non-trivial. In the case of pressure-induced SC in EuFe 2 As 2 , different superconducting transitions with [5, 28] (or without [6]) re-entrant resistance were reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%