2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning the Chemoselectivity of Silyl Protected Rhamnals by Temperature and Brønsted Acidity: Kinetically Controlled 1,2-Addition vs Thermodynamically Controlled Ferrier Rearrangement

Abstract: An acidity-and temperature-dependent chemoselective glycosylation of silyl-protected rhamnals with alcohols has been revealed. The reaction undergoes a 1,2-addition pathway with (±)-CSA as the catalyst at rt, affording kinetically controlled 2-deoxyl rhamnosides. In contrast, only thermodynamically controlled 2,3-unsaturated rhamnosides are formed via Ferrier rearrangement when elevating reaction temperature to 85 °C or using CF 3 SO 3 H instead. This tunable glycosylation allows facile and practical access to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reaction of 3h with potassium phenyltrifluoroborate 4b also proceeded smoothly to provide the corresponding product 5b in 79% yield ( Molander and Fumagalli, 2006 ). Moreover, disaccharide 5c was successfully synthesized in the promotion of BF 3 ·Et 2 O in 72% yield with excellent α-selectivity via the Ferrier rearrangement reaction ( Dharuman et al, 2013 ; Wang et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction of 3h with potassium phenyltrifluoroborate 4b also proceeded smoothly to provide the corresponding product 5b in 79% yield ( Molander and Fumagalli, 2006 ). Moreover, disaccharide 5c was successfully synthesized in the promotion of BF 3 ·Et 2 O in 72% yield with excellent α-selectivity via the Ferrier rearrangement reaction ( Dharuman et al, 2013 ; Wang et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2‐ N ‐(quinolin‐8‐yl)carbamoyl‐1‐((triisopropylsilyl)ethynyl)‐3,4‐ O ‐benzyl‐ l ‐rhamnal (5 a) . 3,4‐di‐ O ‐benzyl‐ l ‐rhamnal was prepared according to the literature [20] . 2‐Iodo‐3,4‐di‐ O ‐benzyl‐ l ‐rhamnal ( S1 ) was synthesized following the described procedure: [18] 3,4‐di‐ O ‐benzyl‐ l ‐rhamnal (1 g, 1 equiv., 3.22 mmol) was dissolved in dry acetonitrile (22 mL) under argon and the resulting mixture was heated to 80 °C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these diverse kinds of reaction routes, a number of synthetic efforts have attempted to control one factor or variant to generate different products with approximate or distinct skeletons in recent reports. These adjusting factors included temperature, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] catalyst, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] additive (e. g. ligand, [22][23][24][25] base [26][27] and reagent [28][29][30][31] ) and solvent. [32][33][34][35] On the basis of the abovementioned investigations, we found that controlling the temperature change is a simple, economical and direct protocol for affecting the formation of different products in comparison with other variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yield = 85% (179 mg); Colorless gum; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H] + calcd for C 24 H 21 O 5 S 421.1110, found 421.1113; NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 8.95 (s, 1H), 7.94 (s, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (dt, J = 2.0, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.29-7.18 (m, 5H), 6.91 (dd, J = 0.8, 8.0 Hz, 1H), FULL PAPER asc.wiley-vch.de6.70 (dt, J = 0.8, 8.0 Hz, 1H),6.54 (dd, J = 0.8, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.47 (br s, 1H), 4.03 (s, 3H), 3.91 (s, 3H); 13 C{ 1 H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 153.7, 151.3, 142.5, 139.8, 135.3, 132.7, 132.2, 131.7, 130.8, 130.7, 130.1, 129.7, 128.4 (2x), 128.2, 127.6 (2x), 126.5, 125.9, 120.3, 117.6, 116.5, 61.1, 56.6.2-(3-Methanesulfonyl-7,8-dimethoxynaphthalen-2-yl)phenol (7 c). Yield = 80% (143 mg); Colorless gum; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H] + calcd for C 19 H 19 O 5 S 359.0953, found 359.0957; NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 8.71 (s, 1H), 8.07 (s, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (dt, J = 2.0, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (dd, J = 2.0, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (dd, J = 0.8, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (dt, J = 0.8, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.69 (br s, 1H), 4.05 (s, 3H), 3.96 (s, 3H), 2.82 (s, 3H); 13 C{ 1 H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 153.7, 151.4, 142.6, 135.0, 131.9, 131.7, 130.9, 130.7, 130.6, 127.9, 127.1, 126.6, 126.0, 121.1, 118.8, 116.6, 61.3, 56.6, 43.0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%