2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.06.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunnel Communication and Increased Graft Signal Intensity on Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kiekara et al 10 observed bone tunnel communication in 10% of patients at the femur and in 15% of patients at the tibia. These authors also reported on the relationship between MRI bone tunnel communication findings and clinical outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kiekara et al 10 observed bone tunnel communication in 10% of patients at the femur and in 15% of patients at the tibia. These authors also reported on the relationship between MRI bone tunnel communication findings and clinical outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To evaluate the graft more objectively, some researchers reported usefulness of SNQ. 10 , 18 , 19 , 26 Weilar et al 18 demonstrated that SNQ of the graft on MRI had a negative correlation with biomechanical parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the 2-year MRI evaluation of 66 patients have been published previously. 19 , 20 In the 2-year evaluation, a 1.5-T MRI (Signa Excite HD imager; GE Healthcare) was used. The 1.5-T imaging protocol included sagittal T1-weighted images with a repetition time/echo time of 2800/19 ms and a slice thickness/gap of 4.0/1.0 mm, sagittal proton density (PD)–weighted images (2320/24 ms and 4.0/1.0 mm), sagittal T2-weighted images (3740/78 ms and 4.0/1.0 mm), coronal T1-weighted images (500/16 ms and 4.0/1.0 mm), coronal fat-suppressed (FS) images (3300/74 ms and 4.0/1.0 mm), axial FS PD-weighted images (1940/40 ms and 4.0/1.0 mm), and oblique sagittal and coronal T1-weighted images along the AM graft plane (660/16 ms and 3.0/0.3 mm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 , 14 , 30 Tunnel enlargement may lead to tunnel communication after DB ACLR. 19 Nonsymptomatic tunnel communication seen on MRI has been reported in 10% to 19% of patients in the femur and in 24% to 29% of patients in the tibia in 1- to 2-year follow-up. 19 , 20 , 30 The long-term consequences of tunnel communication are unknown, but knee instability has been hypothesized to occur.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%