“…On the other hand, it is not difficult to use (20) and Corollary 3 in order to verify that the Hankel determinants for ℓ = 2, 3 read det H (2) n (ν) = 2 −2n(n+2) (n + 1)(n + ν + 1) n (ν) for n ∈ N, ℓ ∈ {0, 1}, and ν > −1, one can also use the formula (15) to prove that det H (ℓ) n (ν), as function of ν, is completely monotone for ν > −1, with n ∈ N and ℓ ∈ {0, 1} fixed. This can be easily checked by using the fact that a product of completely monotone functions is a completely monotone function.…”