1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1777(98)10023-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulence characteristics of tumble flow in a four-valve engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…also found by [76] who used cycle-resolved analysis with a 12 °CA window averaging to obtain in-cycle mean flow and turbulence in a 4-valve pentroof engine of under square geometry with similar bore and compression ratio to that of the current study, imposing various levels of swirl by valve deactivation when the engine was operated at 1500 RPM with wide-open-throttle. Furthermore, the velocities and turbulence intensities of [76] were similar to those of the current investigation, unlike those of [66,67] where intensities close to TDC were only of the order of 0.2-0.5 m/s for a conventional and tumble port at 500 RPM and 1000 RPM. However, the low mean piston speed of only 1.6 m/s at 1000 RPM due to the short stroke of the over-square engine of [66,67] could largely account for the differences found.…”
Section: Frequency Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
“…also found by [76] who used cycle-resolved analysis with a 12 °CA window averaging to obtain in-cycle mean flow and turbulence in a 4-valve pentroof engine of under square geometry with similar bore and compression ratio to that of the current study, imposing various levels of swirl by valve deactivation when the engine was operated at 1500 RPM with wide-open-throttle. Furthermore, the velocities and turbulence intensities of [76] were similar to those of the current investigation, unlike those of [66,67] where intensities close to TDC were only of the order of 0.2-0.5 m/s for a conventional and tumble port at 500 RPM and 1000 RPM. However, the low mean piston speed of only 1.6 m/s at 1000 RPM due to the short stroke of the over-square engine of [66,67] could largely account for the differences found.…”
Section: Frequency Analysissupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Statistical analysis of in-cylinder flow velocities by both LDV and PIV methods in the engine under study showed u values of the order 3.0 m/s on the basis of typical ensemble averaging techniques that lead to 'mean' and 'RMS' values [54,55]. However, methods to distinguish in-cycle bulk velocities from high-frequency turbulence values were also applied to the LDV data of the current engine according to [71] and these led to u values of ~1.5 m/s [55]. The laminar burning velocities of [40,41] at 5 bar, 423 K were used as baseline, whilst all the other parameters were calculated for 5 bar, 500 K, the approximate pressure and temperature at ignition as obtained from the engine's pressure traces.…”
Section: Flame Speed and Roundnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various designs over the years have been introduced in internal combustion engines with the aim of improving its performance. They include the redesigning of its inlet manifold to enhance turbulence, the redesigning of the combustion chamber to increase swirl and tumble [3,4], positioning of the spark plugs for short flame travel and injectors for better fuel mixing etc [5]. All these design factors have all been geared towards improving combustion efficiency, engine power output and a reduction in the amount of expelled products of incomplete combustion [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%