2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10236-018-1147-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulence in the presence of internal waves in the bottom boundary layer of the California inner shelf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measured dissipation levels at this 250 m deep site were as high as 10 −4 m 2 s −3 (Figure 9), with dissipation at 0.49 m ASB consistently a factor of two larger than at 1.4 m ASB (9c). These observed dissipation levels are high relative to the few prior observations of internal wave forced boundary turbulence made at comparable heights ASB, though in much shallower total water depth (e.g., Allen et al, 2018;Becherer et al, 2020;Klymak & Moum, 2003;Moum et al, 2007;Walter et al, 2014). The very high values suggest that boundary-turbulence may be an appreciable sink of energy for freely propagating waves in relatively deep-water such as our shelf site, though a thorough investigation involving net losses integrated over the boundary layer is beyond the scope of the present study.…”
Section: Overview Of the Turbulence Observationsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measured dissipation levels at this 250 m deep site were as high as 10 −4 m 2 s −3 (Figure 9), with dissipation at 0.49 m ASB consistently a factor of two larger than at 1.4 m ASB (9c). These observed dissipation levels are high relative to the few prior observations of internal wave forced boundary turbulence made at comparable heights ASB, though in much shallower total water depth (e.g., Allen et al, 2018;Becherer et al, 2020;Klymak & Moum, 2003;Moum et al, 2007;Walter et al, 2014). The very high values suggest that boundary-turbulence may be an appreciable sink of energy for freely propagating waves in relatively deep-water such as our shelf site, though a thorough investigation involving net losses integrated over the boundary layer is beyond the scope of the present study.…”
Section: Overview Of the Turbulence Observationsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The presence of stable density stratification also limits the growth of the turbulent boundary layer, and the dynamics thus differ greatly from the tidal boundary layers of the vertically well‐mixed coastal ocean (e.g., Milne et al., 2017). The combined effects of stratification and unsteady forcing is seen in the transient boundary layers that can form beneath aperiodic shoaling waves of elevation or internal boluses (e.g., Allen et al., 2018; Davis & Monismith, 2011; Jones et al., 2020; Klymak & Moum, 2003; Moum et al., 2007; Walter et al., 2014), where significant density overturns can be seen well away from the bottom. However, such transient phenomena are distinct from the perennial stably stratified bottom mixing‐layers of interest in the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%