2017
DOI: 10.7827/turkishstudies.12215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Türkçe Öğretmeni Adaylarının Okuma Alışkanlıkları ve Okumaya Yönelik Tutumları

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field of undergraduate (Akbaba, 2017;Arı & Demir, 2013;Arslan, Çelik & Çelik, 2009;Batur, Gülveren & Bek, 2010;Bozpolat, 2010;Demir, 2015;Elkatmış, 2015;Özbay, Bağcı & Uyar, 2008;Yılmaz, Köse & Korkut, 2009), secondary education (Akkaya & Özdemir, 2013;Çeçen & Deniz, 2015) and the habits or attitudes of secondary school students (Balcı, 2009;Can, Deniz & Çeçen, 2016;Demir, 2009;Gönen, Öncü & Işıtan, 2004;Mete, 2012); As it is found that the factors affecting the habit of reading (Aksaçlıoğlu & Yılmaz, 2007;Biçer & Ercan, 2017;Sağlam, Suna & Çengelci, 2008;Uslu Üstten, 2014) are examined, the opinions of teachers (Dağtaş, 2013), teacher candidates (Elkatmış, 2018;Gömleksiz, Kan & Fidan, 2013;Kuru, 2018;Maden, 2012;Odabaş, Odabaş & Binici, 2020;Odabaş, Odabaş & Sevmez, 2018;Ulu & Zelzele, 2018), high school (Çelik, 2015;Maden & Maden, 2016), secondary school (Boz, 2018;Soyuçok & Mazman Akar, 2018) and primary school students (Macit & Demir, 2016) to study digital reading has been found. Moreover, the relationship between the metaphoric perceptions of the teacher candidates for digital reading (Azizoğlu & Okur, 2018) and reading tendencies and reading interests (Bulut & Karasakaloğlu, 2019), the effect of digital reading on reading comprehension…”
Section: Describe Relevant Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of undergraduate (Akbaba, 2017;Arı & Demir, 2013;Arslan, Çelik & Çelik, 2009;Batur, Gülveren & Bek, 2010;Bozpolat, 2010;Demir, 2015;Elkatmış, 2015;Özbay, Bağcı & Uyar, 2008;Yılmaz, Köse & Korkut, 2009), secondary education (Akkaya & Özdemir, 2013;Çeçen & Deniz, 2015) and the habits or attitudes of secondary school students (Balcı, 2009;Can, Deniz & Çeçen, 2016;Demir, 2009;Gönen, Öncü & Işıtan, 2004;Mete, 2012); As it is found that the factors affecting the habit of reading (Aksaçlıoğlu & Yılmaz, 2007;Biçer & Ercan, 2017;Sağlam, Suna & Çengelci, 2008;Uslu Üstten, 2014) are examined, the opinions of teachers (Dağtaş, 2013), teacher candidates (Elkatmış, 2018;Gömleksiz, Kan & Fidan, 2013;Kuru, 2018;Maden, 2012;Odabaş, Odabaş & Binici, 2020;Odabaş, Odabaş & Sevmez, 2018;Ulu & Zelzele, 2018), high school (Çelik, 2015;Maden & Maden, 2016), secondary school (Boz, 2018;Soyuçok & Mazman Akar, 2018) and primary school students (Macit & Demir, 2016) to study digital reading has been found. Moreover, the relationship between the metaphoric perceptions of the teacher candidates for digital reading (Azizoğlu & Okur, 2018) and reading tendencies and reading interests (Bulut & Karasakaloğlu, 2019), the effect of digital reading on reading comprehension…”
Section: Describe Relevant Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu konuda yapılan birçok araştırmada kadın öğretmen adaylarının okumaya yönelik tutumlarının erkek öğretmen adaylarına göre anlamlı bir farklılık gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir (Batur, Gülveren ve Bek, 2010;Duman ve Gökmen, 2018;Odabaş, Odabaş ve Polat, 2008;Özbay, Bağcı, Uyar, 2008;Saracaloğlu, Bozkurt ve Serin, 2003;Saracaloğlu, Yenice ve Karasakaloğlu, 2006;Yalınkılıç, 2007). Akbaba (2017) ise 148 öğretmen adayı ile yaptığı çalışmada cinsiyet değişkenine göre gruplar arasında anlamlı bir farklılık olmadığını tespit etmiştir.…”
Section: Sonuç Tartışma Ve öNerilerunclassified
“…When studies, which were carried out with pre-service teachers upon reading skills, were examined in the body of literature, they are generally observed to be focused on reading success, reading habit and attitude towards reading. Akkaya and İşçi (2018); Tekşan and Çinpolat (2018); Sarikaya (2018); Akbaba (2017); Işık and Demir (2017); Şengül Bircan (2017); Yangil (2017); Biçer and Alan (2017); Durmuş and Baş (2016); Koçak, Çermik, Polat and Şahin (2016); Ulutaş (2016); İlgar, İlgar and Topaç (2015); Akın (2015); Demir (2015); Koçak, Kurtlu, Ulas and Epçapan (2015); Özdemir, Özdemir and Kaya (2015); Gür (2014); Çetinkaya Edizer (2014); Karakuş and Baki (2014), Kalyoncu (2013); Kuzu (2013); Arı and Demir (2013) can be given as examples to these studies which were carried out during the last five years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%