2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4859598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Twiddle factor neutralization method for heterodyne velocimetry

Abstract: Twiddle factor is considered to be the dominant error source of frequency estimate by Fourier transformation (FT), and thus impacts the accuracy in FT-based heterodyne velocimetry. Here we report a novel data analysis method for heterodyne velocimetry, which utilizes the change law of frequency errors with signals' phases to develop twiddle factor neutralization method, improving the performance of heterodyne velocimetry. Numerical simulations show that this method can improve velocity resolution by many times… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A well birefringence matching between the arms of the interferometer can reduce the impact of any polarization evolution due to the target to less than a few percent. In previous studies of HV [7], we noticed that a 90° optical hybrid could improve a fiber velocity interferometer. Such an optical hybrid is a birefringence matched and micro-optics based passive fiber component which can generate four optical signals with phase shifts 0, 90°, 180° and 270° from two optical inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A well birefringence matching between the arms of the interferometer can reduce the impact of any polarization evolution due to the target to less than a few percent. In previous studies of HV [7], we noticed that a 90° optical hybrid could improve a fiber velocity interferometer. Such an optical hybrid is a birefringence matched and micro-optics based passive fiber component which can generate four optical signals with phase shifts 0, 90°, 180° and 270° from two optical inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%