1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9063(199706)50:2<135::aid-ps564>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Analytical Methods for the Measurement of 2,4-D in Oranges: an ELISA Screening Procedure and a GC-MS Confirmatory Procedure

Abstract: : Two analytical methods are presented for the determination of 2,4-D in oranges.The screening procedure uses a commercial ELISA kit, designed for the determination of 2,4-D in water. Good semi-quantitative screening data were obtained provided that the standard solutions used to construct the calibration curve were prepared in blank orange extract. The limited quantiÐcation range of the kit was due to the narrow linear range and di †erences in response to 2,4-D when present as the free acid and as various est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of random water samples from exposure tanks were carried out independently by the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene (University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA). The 2,4-D ELISA is validated in the literature (Hall et al 1993;Lawruk et al 1994), is widely used for the detection of 2,4-D (by the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene and the University of Florida Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, Gainseville, FL, USA), and is used to verify permitted applications of 2,4-D in the field (Williams et al 1997;Chuang et al 2005;Glomski and Netherland 2010;Vdovenko et al 2013;Nault et al 2014Nault et al , 2018. To use the ELISA, the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene confirmed that the quality control standard included in every kit was ±5 ppb, and each calibration curve had an R 2 value of >0.99.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of random water samples from exposure tanks were carried out independently by the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene (University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA). The 2,4-D ELISA is validated in the literature (Hall et al 1993;Lawruk et al 1994), is widely used for the detection of 2,4-D (by the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene and the University of Florida Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, Gainseville, FL, USA), and is used to verify permitted applications of 2,4-D in the field (Williams et al 1997;Chuang et al 2005;Glomski and Netherland 2010;Vdovenko et al 2013;Nault et al 2014Nault et al , 2018. To use the ELISA, the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene confirmed that the quality control standard included in every kit was ±5 ppb, and each calibration curve had an R 2 value of >0.99.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunoassays such as the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) have proved to fulfill to these requirements. Over the past few years, many immunoassays have been developed for detecting numerous pesticides in foodstuffs ( ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods for the individual determination of 2,4-D, carbendazim, thiabendazole, iprodione, and prochloraz in food matrices have been previously reported using gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC–MS) 8 9 , high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) 10 11 , and liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS) 3 12 . However, simultaneous determination of these five compounds in food samples is currently not available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%