2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10898-007-9262-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two aspects of optimal diet determination for pig production: efficiency of solution and incorporation of cost variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a feed formulation problem, most of the integrated techniques are based on LP [94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102], with a few being search-based [103,104].…”
Section: Integrated Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a feed formulation problem, most of the integrated techniques are based on LP [94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102], with a few being search-based [103,104].…”
Section: Integrated Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore pattern changes, instead of level changes, should also be considered. Niemi et al (2010) used dynamic programming and Sirisatien et al (2009) stochastic programming to take into account the variation in the feed cost and carcass payment scheme over time, when searching for optimal feeding schedules.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vast literature exists that deals with the formulation of feed ration and modelling of these formulations. Several mathematical tools have been used to solve feed ration formulation problems such as Pearson's Square method [4], goal programming (GP) [5][6][7], multiobjective goal programming (MOP) [8], multiobjective fractional programming (MOFP) [9], nonlinear programming (NLP) [10], chance constrained programming (CCP) [11,12], quadratic programming (QP) [13], risk formulation (RF) [14], and linear programming (LP) [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%