2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two brain pathways for attended and ignored words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The response to the visual words was only moderately reduced by inattention in the ventral visual pathway, consistent with the fact that the unattended words are nevertheless ''seen.'' In contrast, the response was almost suppressed by inattention in regions mediating semantic and phonological processes in the Broca's area and the precentral gyrus, in agreement with recent fMRI studies showing that the activation generated by unattended stimuli is suppressed in task-relevant brain regions during high attentional load tasks [Rees et al, 1999;Ruz et al, 2005;Yi et al, 2004].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The response to the visual words was only moderately reduced by inattention in the ventral visual pathway, consistent with the fact that the unattended words are nevertheless ''seen.'' In contrast, the response was almost suppressed by inattention in regions mediating semantic and phonological processes in the Broca's area and the precentral gyrus, in agreement with recent fMRI studies showing that the activation generated by unattended stimuli is suppressed in task-relevant brain regions during high attentional load tasks [Rees et al, 1999;Ruz et al, 2005;Yi et al, 2004].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The findings provide further experimental evidence that attention can modulate postperceptual stages of word processing, such as semantic analysis or integration (Miniussi, Marzi, & Nobre, 2005;Rees, Russell, et al, 1999;Bentin et al, 1995;McCarthy & Nobre, 1993;Holcomb, 1988). The findings do not, of course, rule out some residual semantic processing of unattended words (Ruz, Wolmetz, Tudela, & McCandliss, 2005;Ruz, Worden, Tudela, & McCandliss, 2005;Marcel & Patterson, 1978). The precise languagerelated processes modulated by spatial attention during the N400 period remain uncertain, as there is yet no definitive consensus regarding the neural basis or functional significance of the N400.…”
Section: Spatial Orientingmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Other experiments have manipulated the expectations to perform either a verbal or a perceptual/spatial task, to show modulations of language-related ERP components such as the inferior temporal negativity (Lai & Mangels, 2007) or the N400 (Cristescu & Nobre, in press; see also Miniussi, Marzi, & Nobre, 2005). Whereas these and many other studies show that attention modulates language processes, there is also a great deal of reports suggesting that unattended words are also analyzed to a certain extent (e.g., Pesciarelli et al, 2007;Ruz, Wolmetz, Tudela, & McCandliss, 2005;Ruz, Worden, Tudela, & McCandliss, 2005;McCann, Remington, & Van Selst, 2000;Luck, Vogel, & Shapiro, 1996;Stroop, 1935).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%