1995
DOI: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90016-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two classes of olfactory receptors in xenopus laevis

Abstract: Xenopus laevis possess a gene repertoire encoding two distinct classes of olfactory receptors: one class related to receptors of fish and one class similar to receptors of mammals. Sequence comparison indicates that the fish-like receptors represent closely related members of only two subfamilies, whereas mammalian-like receptors are more distantly related, most of them representing a different subfamily. The fish-like receptor genes are exclusively expressed in the lateral diverticulum of the frog's nose, spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
195
0
7

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
195
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent evolutionary studies showed that the phylogenetic diversity of class I ORs exceeds that of class II ORs and that class II ORs form a monophyletic group within class I ORs (Alioto and Ngai 2005;Niimura and Nei 2005). These findings suggest that class II ORs may have originated from class I ORs, consistent with their proposed functional distinction (Freitag et al 1995;Mezler et al 2001). Thus, the two nasal chemosensory systems appear to show a consistent pattern of a shift from receptors for water-soluble molecules to those for volatiles in the vertebrate transition from water to land, reflecting a rare case of adaptation to terrestrial life at the gene family level.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent evolutionary studies showed that the phylogenetic diversity of class I ORs exceeds that of class II ORs and that class II ORs form a monophyletic group within class I ORs (Alioto and Ngai 2005;Niimura and Nei 2005). These findings suggest that class II ORs may have originated from class I ORs, consistent with their proposed functional distinction (Freitag et al 1995;Mezler et al 2001). Thus, the two nasal chemosensory systems appear to show a consistent pattern of a shift from receptors for water-soluble molecules to those for volatiles in the vertebrate transition from water to land, reflecting a rare case of adaptation to terrestrial life at the gene family level.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In fact, two classes of odorant receptors (ORs) are known in vertebrates (Freitag et al 1995). Heterologous cells expressing frog class II ORs and class I ORs have been shown to respond to volatile and water-solvable molecules, respectively (Mezler et al 2001).…”
Section: Evolution Of the Vertebrate V2r Gene Repertoirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work by the Breer group [18] has suggested that the adult middle cavity contains OR class I-expressing neurons (subgroup alpha in Niimura and Nei nomenclature, [19,20]). For one of these OR class I receptors amino acid responses have been shown [21], so this class of receptors would be a plausible candidate for mediating amino acid responses in ciliated neurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freitag et al [14] reported that the middle chamber epithelium in the MC expresses fish-like olfactory receptors, whereas the olfactory epithelium in the PC expresses mammalian-like olfactory receptors. Rössler et al [29] demonstrated that the olfactory marker protein, which is exclusively expressed in vertebrate mature olfactory receptor neurons, shows differential expression between the olfactory epithelium and the middle patterns of axonal projection from each of the three nasal chambers to the olfactory bulb by anterograde labeling using Di-I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%