Low-Cycle Fatigue and Life Prediction 1982
DOI: 10.1520/stp32442s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Decades of Progress in the Assessment of Multiaxial Low-Cycle Fatigue Life

Abstract: A number of studies of the influence of multiaxial stresses and strains on low-cycle fatigue life have been published during the past 20 years. Development of correlations is reviewed and comparisons are made with high-cycle fatigue theories. It is recommended that the more advanced criteria should be incorporated in design procedures to replace the octahedral equivalent strain approach currently used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Case B is observed to be more damaging (shorter life) for the same ATmax. Case A and Case B behaviors are distinctly plotted in the so-called P plane in Figure 24b, which serves as a convenient means of representing experimental data using a two parameter approach [47].…”
Section: A Rrnax M Ao'nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case B is observed to be more damaging (shorter life) for the same ATmax. Case A and Case B behaviors are distinctly plotted in the so-called P plane in Figure 24b, which serves as a convenient means of representing experimental data using a two parameter approach [47].…”
Section: A Rrnax M Ao'nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strain-based models are considered for this study as they are more robust in capturing high-cycle fatigue and also low-cycle fatigue where plasticity may occur, and the models under study have either gained some degree of acceptance or are representative of a larger group of related models [21]. A model has been proposed based on cyclic shear and normal strain on the plane of maximum shear to define the stress parameter [22,23] as in Eq. (1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on the work on Brown and Miller [22], Fatemi and Socie [24] proposed to replace the normal strain term by the normal stress, arguing that normal stress can be used to describe mean stress and non-proportional hardening effects (Eq. (2)).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown, Miller and Kandil [23,24], proposed a model based on cyclic shear and normal strain on the plane of maximum shear to define the stress parameter shown in Eq. (1) [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%