2021
DOI: 10.1109/mmm.2021.3078040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Decades of UWB Filter Technology: Advances and Emerging Challenges in the Design of UWB Bandpass Filters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed UWB filter has a super wideband starting from 2.7 GHz to 12.1 GHz with the 3-dB FBW 127%, central frequency (CF) 7.4 GHz, and 0.1 dB IL over the entire band as depicted in Fig 13 . This bandwidth covers the basic requirements of the UWB range authorized by FCC in 2002 having fractional bandwidth not less than 109% [ 1 ]. To supress the unwanted signal in the UWB range i.e., WLAN, Wi-Fi 6E, and X-band satellite communication system, a triple mode SIR is embedded in the UWB filter to introduce the stopbands at 5.1 GHz, 6 GHz, and 8 GHz, with rejection level greater than -15 dB and insertion loss lower than -1.3 dB for all the three stopbands and is tabulated in Table 3 .…”
Section: Theoretical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed UWB filter has a super wideband starting from 2.7 GHz to 12.1 GHz with the 3-dB FBW 127%, central frequency (CF) 7.4 GHz, and 0.1 dB IL over the entire band as depicted in Fig 13 . This bandwidth covers the basic requirements of the UWB range authorized by FCC in 2002 having fractional bandwidth not less than 109% [ 1 ]. To supress the unwanted signal in the UWB range i.e., WLAN, Wi-Fi 6E, and X-band satellite communication system, a triple mode SIR is embedded in the UWB filter to introduce the stopbands at 5.1 GHz, 6 GHz, and 8 GHz, with rejection level greater than -15 dB and insertion loss lower than -1.3 dB for all the three stopbands and is tabulated in Table 3 .…”
Section: Theoretical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In today’s world of wireless communication systems, the design of microwave filter has become critical due to increasing demand of advanced communication systems [ 1 , 2 ]. A review of recent research literature shows that the field of UWB applications have attracted great interest of RF/microwave and academic researchers since the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licensed frequency band 3.1 GHz to 10.6 GHz for commercial purposes due to its ultra-high-speed data transmission (> 500 Mbit/s), low power dissipation, high selectivity, low insertion loss (IL), and smooth group delay to diminish attenuation in ultra-wideband signal and make it suitable for short distance communication applications [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the MIMU orientation method is less accurate because it is more subject to ambient interference and mistakes brought on by attitude and position solving from pure inertial guiding data. Where conventional GPS [ 9 ] cannot be used in underground mine environments [ 10 ], UWB [ 11 , 12 ] positioning systems can be used in environments where GPS is denied. SINS has been successfully applied to the positioning of continuous coal mining machines [ 13 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore critically important for the researchers and the systems designers to reject or filter these interfering bands, which leads to the concept of filtering, and notch-band characteristics [18]. A number of researchers have proposed and investigated different UWB filter designs with band-rejection capabilities and selectivity at different frequency bands to solve this problem [27]. On the other hand, antennas with band-rejection characteristics can also be designed using different techniques to select certain frequency bands and reject others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%