2003
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8659.t01-1-00643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two‐dimensional Potential Fields for Advanced Implicit Modeling Operators

Abstract: Current methods for building models using implicit volume techniques present problems defining accurate and controllable blend shapes between implicit primitives. We present new methods to extend the freedom and controllability of implicit volume modeling. The main idea is to use a free-form curve to define the profile of the blend region between implicit primitives. The use of a free-form implicit curve, controlled point-by-point in the Euclidean user space, allows us to group boolean composition operators wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When m = 1, it boils down to a simple sum, as the popular operator of Blinn [3], whose continuous extension by Bloomenthal et al [23] yielded to convolution implicit surfaces. While several new composition operators [24,25,26] and composition concepts [27,28] are introduced for field functions with global support, operators for compactly supported fields received less attention until the last decade. Hsu et al [13] improved the control of the blending size using adequate transfer functions modifying the slope of the composed field functions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When m = 1, it boils down to a simple sum, as the popular operator of Blinn [3], whose continuous extension by Bloomenthal et al [23] yielded to convolution implicit surfaces. While several new composition operators [24,25,26] and composition concepts [27,28] are introduced for field functions with global support, operators for compactly supported fields received less attention until the last decade. Hsu et al [13] improved the control of the blending size using adequate transfer functions modifying the slope of the composed field functions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is easily possible to combine implicitly defined surfaces in various ways, e.g., by blending them together or by Boolean operations (CSG), see e.g. [4,15,23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superelliptic approximations of min / max [18] do not describe exact set-theoretic operations and suit only for blending. The elliptic approximation of min / max by Barthe et al [24] is designed initially for blending and the error of the distance function grows infinitely far from the boundary.…”
Section: Distance Function Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bad behavior can cause unexpected results when later operations are applied. The idea developed here is inspired by the work of Barthe et al [24] and consists in replacing the sharp corners in the graphs of min and max (see Fig. 1, left, for the case of the union of two half-planes f 1 (x, y) = x ≥ 0 and f 2 (x, y) = y ≥ 0), by bounded circular approximations (see Fig.…”
Section: Smooth Function Approximation For Set-theoretic Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%