1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0894-7317(14)80117-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiographic Characterization of Ventricular Filling in Real Time by Acoustic Quantification: Comparison with Pulsed Doppler Echocardiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference values for RV apical four-chamber area-indexes in 50 healthy adults were similar to our results [10]. For assessment of LV function in adults, the Acoustic Quantification system has been validated against conventional twodimensional and Doppler echocardiography, MRI, and radionuclide studies; and acceptable interobserver reproducibility has been reported [4,8,10,13,18,21,24,25,27]. Correlation between Acoustic Quantification and manually traced areas has been adequate, particularly in the LV short-axis view [13,27].…”
Section: Echocardiographic Automated Border Detectionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reference values for RV apical four-chamber area-indexes in 50 healthy adults were similar to our results [10]. For assessment of LV function in adults, the Acoustic Quantification system has been validated against conventional twodimensional and Doppler echocardiography, MRI, and radionuclide studies; and acceptable interobserver reproducibility has been reported [4,8,10,13,18,21,24,25,27]. Correlation between Acoustic Quantification and manually traced areas has been adequate, particularly in the LV short-axis view [13,27].…”
Section: Echocardiographic Automated Border Detectionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The main reasons are inaccuracies in the position of the region of interest and the dependence on gain settings of this system. Excessive gain may result in cavity clutter and underestimation, low gain to endocardial dropout, and overestimation of Acoustic Quantification areas [13,25,27]. As the comparison of corrected Acoustic Quantification and conventional echocardiography results in our study show, these potential problems introduce additional variation but do not result in important systematic errors.…”
Section: Echocardiographic Automated Border Detectionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At least with transesophageal echocardiography a closer correlation to acoustic quantification may exist, if Doppler parameters are recorded at the annulus level as compared to the tips of the mitral valve. 17 As Doppler echocardiography and acoustic quantification test different aspects of diastolic behavior, their combined use may be complementary and improve the noninvasive identification of diastolic dysfunction. Our findings let us hypothesize that acoustic quantification might even be superior to Doppler echocardiography for detection of early or mild diastolic dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inter-beat variability caused by these determinants represents a limitation to the ability of the AQ technique to evaluate ventricular function, in particular LV filling characteristics (STODDARD et at., 1994;GOTTLIEB et at., 1995;VITARELLI et al, 1996), when only few beats are considered. To overcome this limitation, methods based on signal averaging of AQ waveforms (SAAQ) by template matching have been proposed and utilised to improve the reliability of clinical measurements (MoR-AvI et al, 1995;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%