2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Experimental Models for Generating Abdominal Adhesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Adhesion induction was performed under sterile conditions using a standardized cecal abrasion model as previously described [19,29]. To reduce the possible influence of transient ischemia or foreign body related immune response, neither clamping of the arteries supplying the bowel wall or implantation of alloplastic mesh material was performed [16]. Antibiotic treatment was not given before or during the experimental setting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adhesion induction was performed under sterile conditions using a standardized cecal abrasion model as previously described [19,29]. To reduce the possible influence of transient ischemia or foreign body related immune response, neither clamping of the arteries supplying the bowel wall or implantation of alloplastic mesh material was performed [16]. Antibiotic treatment was not given before or during the experimental setting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A metodologia de indução de aderência tem sido inconsistente nas pesquisas quanto aos métodos de indução e interpretações dos resultados, não fornecendo eficácia (GAERTNER et al, 2008). A inflamação e isquemia são indispensá-veis na adesiogênese intestinal por desestabilizar o mecanismo fibrinolítico (LOUISE; BAXTER, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Gaertner et al expressed their concerns in current adhesion models when they stated: ''because there is no consistent, quantifiable, and reproducible model to establish a baseline, results have been difficult to evaluate'' [14]. Furthermore, it is also problematic to draw definitive conclusions from anti-adhesive proposals when no credible adhesion model is in place to validate these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%