2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-959108/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-fifths of women are not autonomous in maternal health service utilization: A community-based cross-sectional study

Abstract: Background: Autonomy of women in health care decision-making is tremendously crucial for improved maternal health outcomes and women’s empowerment. Women with greater freedom of movement are more likely to receive maternal health services. However, little has been investigated about women’s autonomy in maternal health care decision-making and contributing factors in Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to assess decision-making autonomy on maternal health care services utilization and associated factors among w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the qualification stage, 70 articles were completely approved and evaluated for eligibility. Finally, this systematic review and meta-analysis included 19 studies 29,3133,35,37,43,46,5465 with 103,983 study participants (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the qualification stage, 70 articles were completely approved and evaluated for eligibility. Finally, this systematic review and meta-analysis included 19 studies 29,3133,35,37,43,46,5465 with 103,983 study participants (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 43.76-66.49 Alemayehu and Meskel 35 54.97 43.57-66.37 Eshetu et al 55 54.98 43.60-66.36 Diriba et al 57 54.54 43.16-65.91 Tadesse 56 55. 16 43.79-66.54 Kebede et al 63 54.04 42.65-65.44 Duha and Adisah-Atta 31 54.04 42.34-65.70 Nigatu et al 29 55.91 44.56-67.27 Situ 37 56.27 44.99-67.56 Tesema et al 60 53.68 41.79-65.57 Adhikari 64 56.11 44.75-67.47 Ameyaw et al 43 57.00 46.47-67.54 Feijen-de Jong et al 32 54.77 43.39-66.15 Kassahun and Zewudie 54 54.85 43.48-66.23 Haque et al 65 56.50 45.22-67.77 Obsanoha et al 59 55.97 44.86-67.08 Chilinda et al 62 55. 50 43.83-67.17 Abedin and Arunachalan 62 54.80 43.44-66.16 Mondal et al 46 53.63 43.49-63.76…”
Section: Study Omitted Estimate 95% Confidence Intervalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation