1970
DOI: 10.2172/4093364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Fluid Molten-Salt Breeder Reactor Design Study (Status as of January 1, 1968).

Abstract: MASTER

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liquid-molten-salt fuel was well studied along with the successful use of UF 4 -7 LiF-BeF 2 -ZrF 4 (65:29:5:1) at the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory [5,6]. Considering these facts, we use the composition UF 4 -7 LiF-BeF 2 = 40:46:14 in the present study after adjustment to obtain criticality with an appropriate excess reactivity.…”
Section: Reactor System and Core Design Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Liquid-molten-salt fuel was well studied along with the successful use of UF 4 -7 LiF-BeF 2 -ZrF 4 (65:29:5:1) at the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory [5,6]. Considering these facts, we use the composition UF 4 -7 LiF-BeF 2 = 40:46:14 in the present study after adjustment to obtain criticality with an appropriate excess reactivity.…”
Section: Reactor System and Core Design Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the volume of the peripheral region is larger than the core center region for the same radial width yielding an importance to the periphery in the total thermal power. Though no fissile exists in the reflector as seen in Figure 8, the persistent increase of the third-group flux toward the inner periphery of the reflector leads to a large reactivity worth of the control material 6 Li in it as far as it is close to the fuel-reflector boundary as shown in Figure 10. The reactivity worth of the absorber is defined as k in − k out , where k in stands for the k eff with only one of the three LRMs inserted and k out for all the absorbers withdrawn.…”
Section: Neutron Flux Reaction Rate Distribution Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations