2014
DOI: 10.1186/1687-1499-2014-39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-hop time synchronization protocol for sensor networks

Abstract: One of the critical middleware services for sensor networks is the time synchronization, which provides supports to different applications. Synchronization protocols used for Internet and LANs are not appropriate in the sensor networks for the high-density and limited energy resource. This paper describes two-hop time synchronization (TTS) that aims at reducing the synchronization overhead and providing more accurate network-wide synchronization. The synchronization message exchanges are minimized by making fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation has been performed in MATLAB 2013a. The performance of CBTS protocol is compared with TPSN [15] and TTS [18] protocols. The performance metrics include the number of nodes in the WSN, initial energy of the SNs, total number of messages per synchronization round, total energy dissipation per synchronization round, propagated synchronization error and convergence time.…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation has been performed in MATLAB 2013a. The performance of CBTS protocol is compared with TPSN [15] and TTS [18] protocols. The performance metrics include the number of nodes in the WSN, initial energy of the SNs, total number of messages per synchronization round, total energy dissipation per synchronization round, propagated synchronization error and convergence time.…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In wireless sensor networks, a lot of research [10]- [31] has already been carried out to design time synchronization protocols such as Reference Broadcast Synchronization (RBS) [11], Romer synchronization [13], TPSN (Timing Sync Protocols for Sensors Networks) [15], Two-hop time synchronization protocol for sensor networks (TTS) [18], Fast distributed multi-hop relative time synchronization protocol and estimators for wireless sensor networks [19], Long term and large scale time synchronization in wireless sensor networks (2LTSP) [20], and Average time synchronization in wireless sensor networks by pairwise messages (ATSP) [21], Time synchronization protocol based on spanning tree [28], Lightweight and Energy Efficient Time Synchronization (LEETS) Protocols [29] and Lightweight Fault-tolerant Time synchronization [30]. Some of these protocols synchronize the nodes internally by placing the nodes on common notion of time and some synchronize externally by using large number of messages to adjust the clocks of the sensor nodes with global clock.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially the performance of proposed algorithms has been compared with each other, and then compared with Tow-hop time synchronization (TTS) [27], Average Time Synchronization (ATS) [29] and Timing sync protocols for sensor networks (TPSN). The performance evaluation includes message exchange, energy consumption, skew error rate and synchronization delay.…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author had presented the work in the form of mathematical modelling and graph theory to find reduced synchronization error as an outcome. Wang et al [13] have presented a mechanism that can perform synchronization of time along with supportability of multi-hop communication in sensor network. The author have perform rectification of time synchronization problems on two hops for minimizing an adverse effect of overhead and furnishing seamless synchronization to all nodes in dynamic networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%