2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002030050007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two new arsenate/sulfate-reducing bacteria: mechanisms of arsenate reduction

Abstract: Two sulfate-reducing bacteria, which also reduce arsenate, were isolated; both organisms oxidized lactate incompletely to acetate. When using lactate as the electron donor, one of these organisms, Desulfomicrobium strain Ben-RB, rapidly reduced (doubling time = 8 h) 5.1 mM arsenate at the same time it reduced sulfate (9.6 mM). Sulfate reduction was not inhibited by the presence of arsenate. Arsenate could act as the terminal electron acceptor in minimal medium (doubling time = 9 h) in the absence of sulfate. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
108
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
108
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…2: b-c). It is consistent with the previously observed simultaneous reduction of SO 4 2− and As (V) (Macy et al, 2000) or Fe(III) and As(V) (Smeaton et al, 2012), in which As is reduced as part of a detoxification pathway. Furthermore, the suggested detoxification mechanism may explain the bioreduction of other potentially toxic elements, for example U(VI), which can be reduced alongside of Fe(III) or SO 4 2− in sediments (Finneran et al, 2002;Komlos et al, 2008).…”
Section: Respiration Versus Detoxificationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…2: b-c). It is consistent with the previously observed simultaneous reduction of SO 4 2− and As (V) (Macy et al, 2000) or Fe(III) and As(V) (Smeaton et al, 2012), in which As is reduced as part of a detoxification pathway. Furthermore, the suggested detoxification mechanism may explain the bioreduction of other potentially toxic elements, for example U(VI), which can be reduced alongside of Fe(III) or SO 4 2− in sediments (Finneran et al, 2002;Komlos et al, 2008).…”
Section: Respiration Versus Detoxificationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…1c and 2c); this suggested that the SRB is only a part of the As(V)-reducing bacteria in the paddy soil. It was also previously shown that some of the SRB species have the ability of dissimilatory respiration of As(V) (Newman et al 1997;Macy et al 2000), suggesting that dissimilatory As(V) reduction also occurs in the sulfidogenic zone. Saalfield and Bostick (2009) suggest that bacterial reduction of As(V) is necessary for As sequestration in sulfides, even where sulfate reduction is active.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…2). Most energy for microbes is generated from respiration supported by O 2 as the electron acceptor and under anaerobic conditions like flooded paddy soil, also by Fe(III), SO 4 2− , and As(V) etc., which is conducted by special microbial groups, and their activities determine the speciation and fate of elements in the environment (Newman et al 1997;Macy et al 2000;Lovley and Coats 2000;Saalfield and Bostick 2009). A stable community of SRB was obtained using enrichment culture method by SO 4 2− enrichment for 15 transfers and was also suggested to use the As(V) and Fe(III) as the electron acceptor under anaerobic soil conditions (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, many more microorganisms that can reduce As(V) to arsenite [H 3 AsO 3 , As(III)] have been discovered (5)(6)(7)(8), but a mechanistic understanding of this metabolism has lagged. To date, only three studies have described the biochemistry of arsenate respiration (5,9,10), and detailed biochemical analyses have not been performed. In part, the limitations of these studies can be attributed to the fact that the As(V)-respiring organisms being studied were not genetically tractable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%