“…So far, four types of structures are reported and given based on their different stoichiometries as follows: 1–1–2–4 type (i.e., RbCuSb 2 S 4 and CsCuSb 2 S 4 ), 1–2–1–3 type [i.e., ACu 2 SbS 3 (A = K, Rb, and Cs) and KCu 2 SbSe 3 ], 2–1–1–3 type (i.e., Na 2 CuSbS 3 and K 2 CuSbS 3 ), and 2–2–2–5 type (i.e., Rb 2 Cu 2 Sb 2 S 5 , Cs 2 Cu 2 Sb 2 S 5 , and Cs 2 Cu 2 Sb 2 Se 5 ). It is worth mentioning that the structure change trend of these compounds does not follow the previously reported inherent laws between the structural dimension and guest/host metal atom ratio. − For instance, RbCuSb 2 S 4 and KCu 2 SbS 3 show identical A/(Cu + Sb) ratios (i.e., 0.33), but the former possesses a 3D framework structure and the latter adopts a 2D-layered structure. Further structural analysis shows that the Cu/Sb ratio is the major determinant of structural dimension change (shown below).…”