2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-phase Material Point Method applied to the study of cone penetration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
41
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these research works required the stabilization of the original methodology. The MPM developed by Sulsky et al is utilized by a wide range of researchers, for example, Soga et al, Alonso and Zabala, and Solowski et al Despite that the application of MPM to geotechnical problems is relatively recent, several implementations of this methodology have been already employed to model rigid body contact in soils …”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of these research works required the stabilization of the original methodology. The MPM developed by Sulsky et al is utilized by a wide range of researchers, for example, Soga et al, Alonso and Zabala, and Solowski et al Despite that the application of MPM to geotechnical problems is relatively recent, several implementations of this methodology have been already employed to model rigid body contact in soils …”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MPM developed by Sulsky et al 37 is utilized by a wide range of researchers, for example, Soga et al, 38 Alonso and Zabala, 39 and Solowski et al 18 Despite that the application of MPM to geotechnical problems is relatively recent, several implementations of this methodology have been already employed to model rigid body contact in soils. 40 Other meshfree methodologies that have applied contact mechanics in geotechnical applications are the arbitrarian Lagrangian-Eulerian formulations (ALE) such as the so-called remeshing and interpolation technique by small strain developed by Randolph et al, [41][42][43] the so-called efficient ALE approach developed by Nazem et al, 44,45 and the successive built-in implementation of ALE in Abaqus/Explicit, currently known as the coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian. 46 A comparative review of these ALE methods has been recently presented by Wang et al 47 Finally, the particle finite element method, 67 an updated Lagrangian approach that avoids mesh distortion problems by frequent remeshing, seems suitable to address geotechnical insertion problems.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those implementations improved the errors directly related to cell‐crossing, yet some high frequency noises are still present in the solutions. A simple approach to reduce those spurious noises is to add a nonviscous damping to the linear momentum balance equations such as described in the implicit or two‐phase formulations . However, the local damping leads to energy dissipation, inaccuracies in the time‐dependent simulations, such as in the consolidation process and, in extreme cases, to an over‐damped system with qualitatively different characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple approach to reduce those spurious noises is to add a nonviscous damping to the linear momentum balance equations such as described in the implicit 14 or two-phase formulations. 15,16 However, the local damping leads to energy dissipation, inaccuracies in the time-dependent simulations, such as in the consolidation process 15 and, in extreme cases, to an over-damped system with qualitatively different characteristics. To avoid these severe limitations, for example, Lu et al 17 and Renaud et al 18 combined the time-discontinuous Galerkin method to the MPM to control the spurious noises.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical analyses are performed using the dynamic explicit code Anura3D (www.anura3d.eu), which implements a full 3D MPM formulation and it is therefore suitable to simulate the three-dimensional soil deformations induced by the movement of the plate. It implements an enhanced version of the original MPM proposed by Sulsky, Chen, & Schreyer, (1994), which has been extensively validated for geomechanical problems (Al-Kafaji, 2013;Yerro, 2015) including slope failures (Soga, Alonso, Yerro, Kumar, & Bandara, 2016;Yerro, Alonso, & Pinyol, 2016) and soil penetration problems Ceccato, Beuth, Vermeer, & Simonini, 2016;Phuong et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%