2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.vlsi.2008.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-phase synchronization with sub-cycle latency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Verbitsky [6] has described a four‐stage mesochronous synchroniser that provides lower latency and full throughput. Dobkin and Ginosar [7] also proposed two synchronisers that are based on two‐phase protocols. The first one is a low‐latency two‐flip‐flop design and the other one uses a sub‐cycle latency locally delayed latch synchroniser.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verbitsky [6] has described a four‐stage mesochronous synchroniser that provides lower latency and full throughput. Dobkin and Ginosar [7] also proposed two synchronisers that are based on two‐phase protocols. The first one is a low‐latency two‐flip‐flop design and the other one uses a sub‐cycle latency locally delayed latch synchroniser.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the network is more complicated to design. Given that crossing a f domain only adds about 2 ns [12], we choose the simple, single f domain for the network. Hence, when clusters within an ensemble communicate, they cross f domains.…”
Section: Rationale: Simplicity and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-phase operation mode can be triggered to work at rising edge and falling edge of the request signal. So its working speed is much higher than that of four-phase operation mode [10] . But two-phase protocol does not fit function module design due to its high complexity; therefore, it is more preferable for communications between asynchronous routers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%