2015
DOI: 10.14257/ijhit.2015.8.5.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Phases Learning Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Fig. 2 depicted the boxplots for ISFLA, GSA [13], SMO [14] and DE [15]. The outcomes demonstrate that interquartile range and medians of ISFLA are low in the correlation of GSA, SMO and DE.…”
Section: B Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The Fig. 2 depicted the boxplots for ISFLA, GSA [13], SMO [14] and DE [15]. The outcomes demonstrate that interquartile range and medians of ISFLA are low in the correlation of GSA, SMO and DE.…”
Section: B Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…According to the articles [11,12,[16][17][18], H parameter is a random number that varies between 0 and 1. To improve the performance of the proposed algorithm and to highlight the influence of this parameter on the results obtained, we varied H as shown in the following Table 4.…”
Section: Influence Of Parameter H On the Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clustering method based on intelligent optimization can convert a particular clustering problem to an optimization problem of the objective function, which finds the optimal value of the objective function to obtain the optimal clustering scheme through repeated iteration. The key technologies in using 1385 intelligent computing to solve the optimization problem include coding of the problem and design of an appropriate fitness function [11][12][13][14]. In this study, the shuffled leapfrog algorithm is combined with the K-means algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%