1992
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90096-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two separate neural mechanisms of brightness induction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
46
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Attempts to provide a theoretical account for psychophysically observed brightness or darkness asymmetries generally suggest two-stage processing models, with a first stage that is sensitive to local contrast and its sign, and a second stage in which contrast intensity only, not its sign, is preserved (e.g., Hamada, 1991;Shapley & Reid, 1985;Shevell et al, 1992). The extent to which such models can make general predictions regarding the direction of a psychophysical brightness/darkness match is another question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Attempts to provide a theoretical account for psychophysically observed brightness or darkness asymmetries generally suggest two-stage processing models, with a first stage that is sensitive to local contrast and its sign, and a second stage in which contrast intensity only, not its sign, is preserved (e.g., Hamada, 1991;Shapley & Reid, 1985;Shevell et al, 1992). The extent to which such models can make general predictions regarding the direction of a psychophysical brightness/darkness match is another question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamada' s theory has been of relevance to Grossberg and Mingolla's (1985) macro-model approach to brightness-based form perception. Shevell, Holliday, and Whittle (1992) Although each of the theories briefly introduced here attempt to explain a limited set of psychophysical observations, they all converge toward the idea that, at some stage in the processing of brightness-based f igureground percepts, the direction, or sign, of local contrast has to be discarded. The present study, in which brightness/darkness cancellation procedures equivalent to the one described earlier by Dresp (1992) were used, was designed to shed more light on the possible functional significance of interactions between figure-ground organization (spatial factor) and figure-ground contrast (luminance factor) in achromatic and colored configurations of the Kanizsa type.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,55,56 For simpler viewing conditions, Shevell and colleagues have also been able to demonstrate cases in which factors other than local contrast affect appearance. 38,39,57,58 C. Role of the Spatial Average A simple alternative to the idea that local contrast governs color appearance is that the visual system uses the spatial average of the cone photoreceptor responses to normalize its processing of color information. 22,24,43,44 This alternative does not require that local contrast be the key variable for predicting color appearance.…”
Section: B Role Of Local Contrastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, two circles of the same luminance appear to have different lightness if one is embedded in a dark surround and another in a bright surround. This phenomenon, which is called simultaneous lightness contrast, has been investigated extensively (e.g., Heinemann, 1955;Reid & Shapley, 1989;Shevell, Holiday, & Whittle, 1992). The simultaneous lightness contrast dramatically demonstrates the dissociation between the amount of light arriving at the retina and our perception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%