2006 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icmlc.2006.258976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Separation Axioms in L-Fuzzy Topological Spaces

Abstract: In [14, 15], 2 1 1 T and 2 T spaces have been introduced and investigated. In this paper, their properties are further studied. The 2 1 1T and 2 T separation axioms are described with molecular nets and ideals, some interesting new results are found. We also give applications of some weakly continuous order homophisms in separation axioms. Keywords:2 1 1 T and 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, a multitude of pairwise network alignment methods have been developed based on the consistency principle (Singh, Xu, and Berger 2008;Koutra, Tong, and Lubensky 2013;Zhang and Tong 2016), node embedding (Li et al 2019;Chu et al 2019;Zhang et al 2021), and optimal transport (OT) (Maretic et al 2019(Maretic et al , 2022Chen et al 2020;Zeng et al 2023a) with superior performance, but this is not the case for the multi-network setting due to two fundamental challenges. First (discrepancy measure), most existing pairwise methods essentially optimize the pairwise discrepancy (e.g., Frobenius norm (Zhang and Tong 2016), contrastive loss (Chu et al 2019), and Wasserstein distance (Maretic et al 2020)) between one network and its aligned counterpart, but a similar discrepancy measure for multi-network is lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a multitude of pairwise network alignment methods have been developed based on the consistency principle (Singh, Xu, and Berger 2008;Koutra, Tong, and Lubensky 2013;Zhang and Tong 2016), node embedding (Li et al 2019;Chu et al 2019;Zhang et al 2021), and optimal transport (OT) (Maretic et al 2019(Maretic et al , 2022Chen et al 2020;Zeng et al 2023a) with superior performance, but this is not the case for the multi-network setting due to two fundamental challenges. First (discrepancy measure), most existing pairwise methods essentially optimize the pairwise discrepancy (e.g., Frobenius norm (Zhang and Tong 2016), contrastive loss (Chu et al 2019), and Wasserstein distance (Maretic et al 2020)) between one network and its aligned counterpart, but a similar discrepancy measure for multi-network is lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%