Two sides of the same coin: Business resilience and community resilience

Adekola, Josephine; Clelland, David

doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12275

Cited by 71 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, the results will provide scholars with a better understanding of the types of public, private and nonprofit organizations that engage in disaster preparedness as well as the kinds of preparedness measures these organizations adopt. This study also continues conversations occurring within the crisis management field that underscore how engaging organizations from the public, private and nonprofit sector can help improve communities' resilience to future disasters (Adekola & Clelland, ; Darkow, ; Torres, Marshall, & Sydnor, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 72%

Variations in employees' perceptions of organizational disaster preparedness

Tyler

Sadiq

Chikoto‐Schultz

2019

Contingencies & Crisis Mgmt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Few studies have sought to understand the different kinds of preparedness measures public, private and nonprofit organizations adopt and the factors motivating these organizations to adopt different kinds of preparedness measures. The present study addresses these gaps in research using perceptions from 1,960 public, private and nonprofit employees. Results indicate significant variations in public, private and nonprofit employees' perceptions of the kinds of preparedness measures their organizations adopt. Findings also suggest there are variations in the factors motivating public, private and nonprofit organizations to adopt different kinds of preparedness measures. The results provide important insights to emergency managers aiming to increase the levels of disaster preparedness among organizations within their communities.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 72%

Variations in employees' perceptions of organizational disaster preparedness

Tyler

Sadiq

Chikoto‐Schultz

2019

Contingencies & Crisis Mgmt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They stressed that small business disaster recovery should encompass the individual, family, and community context, as these factors are important in recovery from a natural disaster. Adekola and Clelland ( 2019 ) also found that rural, small businesses had a major influence on community resilience after natural disasters. Small business owners were often volunteers who contributed individually to community recovery.…”

Section: Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 97%

The Effect of Cash Flow Problems and Resource Intermingling on Small Business Recovery and Resilience After a Natural Disaster

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigated the implications that cash flow problems and resource intermingling between the family and the business had on small business recovery and resilience after a natural disaster. This study contributed to the literature by studying the impact of cash flow problems and resource intermingling on small businesses in two separate periods: right after the natural disaster (period 1) and eight years after the disaster (period 2). Period 1 determined whether the business was in operation directly following Hurricane Katrina. Period 2 investigated success of the small business after Katrina (compared to pre-Katrina success). Results showed that cash flow problems and resource intermingling did not affect operational status directly following Katrina, but did play a role in business resilience in the long run.

show abstract

“…In the context of business and community, ECSR practices can improve community development (Fordham, Robinson, & Van Leeuwen, 2018) and increase community capacity as an effort to express the capacity and collective community (Rama, Milano, Salas, & Liu, 2009). A recent study by Adekola and Clelland (2020) has concluded that business resilience can improve individual resilience. This study analyses the effects of ECSR on the EWB of the community by mediating community resilience.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of environmental corporate social responsibility on environmental well‐being perception and the mediation role of community resilience

Rela

Awang

Ramli

et al. 2020

Corp Soc Responsibility Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) is corporate business sustainability for the future and a noble ethical that fosters social, economic and environmental well‐being (EWB) of the community. Based on environmental protection and management, the Indonesian mining company is obliged to mitigate and conserve the surrounding environmental ecosystem. The mining company invested IDR17.35 billion on ECSR since 2006. This study examines the effects of ECSR on EWB of the community by mediating community resilience. The subjects were family household leaders in 12 villages who were direct and indirect recipients of ECSR. Partial least squares‐based structural equation modelling analysis was used to determine the effects of ECSR on the community EWB. In addition, were analysed mediated effects by community resilience (CR). The findings of this study confirmed that ECSR practices had positive and significant effects on CR and EWB. As a mediator, CR significantly contributed to the sustainable EWB of the community.

show abstract

Two sides of the same coin: Business resilience and community resilience

Cited by 71 publications

References 29 publications

Variations in employees' perceptions of organizational disaster preparedness

Variations in employees' perceptions of organizational disaster preparedness

The Effect of Cash Flow Problems and Resource Intermingling on Small Business Recovery and Resilience After a Natural Disaster

Effects of environmental corporate social responsibility on environmental well‐being perception and the mediation role of community resilience

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About