2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20495-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-stage variable-fidelity modeling of antennas with domain confinement

Abstract: Surrogate modeling has become the method of choice in solving an increasing number of antenna design tasks, especially those involving expensive full-wave electromagnetic (EM) simulations. Notwithstanding, the curse of dimensionality considerably affects conventional metamodeling methods, and their capability to efficiently handle nonlinear antenna characteristics over broad ranges of the system parameters is limited. Performance-driven (or constrained) modeling frameworks may be employed to mitigate these iss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another ML-assisted antenna optimization method employing the use of multifidelity or variable-fidelity models of the given antenna structure in the optimization process to further improve the efficiency of surrogate modeling and the overall optimization process has been proposed [29]. In [29], variablefidelity EM models are used for both the surrogate domain definition and the final rendering of the surrogate model employed in the optimization process. Co-kriging is then employed to blend the low-fidelity and high-fidelity simulation data to better manage model discrepancies.…”
Section: Multifidelity Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another ML-assisted antenna optimization method employing the use of multifidelity or variable-fidelity models of the given antenna structure in the optimization process to further improve the efficiency of surrogate modeling and the overall optimization process has been proposed [29]. In [29], variablefidelity EM models are used for both the surrogate domain definition and the final rendering of the surrogate model employed in the optimization process. Co-kriging is then employed to blend the low-fidelity and high-fidelity simulation data to better manage model discrepancies.…”
Section: Multifidelity Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional metamodeling methodologies cannot handle nonlinear antenna characteristics across a large range of system parameters due to the curse of dimensionality. Performance-driven modeling frameworks that build surrogates from antenna performance numbers rather than geometric factors can overcome this issue [ 38 ]. This method dramatically reduces model setup costs without losing design utility.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts in space‐mapping/knowledge‐based modeling methods have also been expressed 6–14 to help EM parametric modeling and optimization perform better. Various space‐mapping methods have been introduced to map pre‐existing knowledge such as crude models, onto the EM response of microwave devices 15–49 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%