Two-step pick-up impression procedure for implant-retained overdentures

Gregory-Head, Belinda; LaBarre, Eugene

doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70063-6

Cited by 15 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For all impression techniques, the transfer copings were picked up to the polished surface of the tray with autopolymerizing acrylic resin (Gregory‐Head & LaBarre ) which also supports the light‐body material (Fig. ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of mandibular denture base deformation with different impression techniques for implant overdentures

ELsyad

El-Waseef

Al-Mahdy

et al. 2012

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of mandibular denture base deformation with different impression techniques for implant overdentures

ELsyad

El-Waseef

Al-Mahdy

et al. 2012

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They can be used in implant-retained overdentures. [5][6][7] Gregory and Labarre introduced a two-step pick-up impression technique that uses a tray to make a conventional impression. Two holes are drilled in the tray the implant impression copings will pass through.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, extra clinical time is required for drilling the holes and splinting the implant copings with resin intraorally. 6 Some articles suggest single anatomical impression procedures, 7 but use of the one-stage impression technique is not recommended for tooth-tissue supported RPDs, because different portions of the ridge vary in displaceability under functional loads.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Dual Impression Technique for Implant Overdentures

Jannesar

Siadat

Alikhasi

2007

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[17][18][19][20][21] The overdenture impression have to record the denture bearing areas simultaneously with accurate positioning of the implant components. 22 In the literature, three types of impression techniques have been described for impression of IROs. Firstly, the single stage impression procedure that is used with a closed or an open impression trays.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2 The double impression techniques have been described and it has been focused on the relation between the soft tissue supporting structures and the implants. 22,32 On the contrary, FITs have been reported to record the alveolar mucosa in a functional state and the implant components correctly. [27][28][29][30][31] Although several techniques and case reports have been reported for making impression of IROs, any clinical studies which are evaluating effect of the implant impression techniques on satisfaction of the patient are lacking.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Effect of Impression Techniques to Satisfaction of Edentulous Patients Treated With Implant-Retained Overdentures: A Pilot Study

TOKAR¹,

Polat²,

ULUDAĞ³

2016

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The implant-retained mandibular overdentures are standard care of the edentulous patients. Function, phonetics and satisfaction of the patient are decisive to acquire prospering treatment results. Passive fit between the implants and the denture framework is important for restoration of the implants. Accurate impression is primary factor to obtain fitted denture. Several impression techniques (single stage, double, and functional impression techniques) described making impression of the implant-retained overdentures. The aim of this study was to evaluate influence of two different implant-retained overdenture impression techniques to quality of life of the patients. Materials and Method: Six women edentulous patients participated in this study. 2 implant-retained overdentures were fabricated using two different impression techniques per patient. The first overdentures were produced using the single stage close tray impression technique. After 6 months, the functional impression technique was used to fabricate the second overdentures. 13 questions were asked to the patients about both of their dentures in the first follow up visits those two days after the delivery of their overdentures. The Mann-Whitney U statistical analysis was performed on the acquired data. Results: The patients satisfied with the performance of both of the overdentures. Half of the participants complained soreness of the gums under the overdenture that was fabricated using the close tray impression technique. Other questionnaire items were shown no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: The single stage close tray, and the functional impression techniques are used confidently to fabricate the implant-retained mandibular overdentures. The functional impression technique decreased chair time of the post-insertion maintenance.

show abstract

Two-step pick-up impression procedure for implant-retained overdentures

Cited by 15 publications

References 2 publications

A comparison of mandibular denture base deformation with different impression techniques for implant overdentures

A comparison of mandibular denture base deformation with different impression techniques for implant overdentures

A Dual Impression Technique for Implant Overdentures

Evaluation of Effect of Impression Techniques to Satisfaction of Edentulous Patients Treated With Implant-Retained Overdentures: A Pilot Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About