2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2005.01.266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-stream stability assessment of intense heavy ion beams propagating in a plasma immersed in an axial magnetic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike all previous analyses [8][9][10] Because the residual maximum growth rate is of order the electron cyclotron frequency in the layer, the mode frequency is strongly affected by the layer self-magnetic field. The detailed analysis of the dispersion function W (ω) in Sec.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike all previous analyses [8][9][10] Because the residual maximum growth rate is of order the electron cyclotron frequency in the layer, the mode frequency is strongly affected by the layer self-magnetic field. The detailed analysis of the dispersion function W (ω) in Sec.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…One of the fastest instabilities involving the lightest species is the two-stream instability between the electrons flowing inside the beam and the stationary electrons outside the beam. Such an instability has been studied previously by several authors and has been shown to have maximum growth rate of the order of the background electron plasma frequency ω pe = (4πe 2 n e0 /m e ) 1/2 [8][9][10]. Here −e is the electron charge and m e is the electron mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For a recent review of collective beam-plasma instabilities see Davidson et al (2004Davidson et al ( , 2009. In a recent paper (Startsev et al, 2009), we have reconsidered the stability of the background electron return current, found to be strongly unstable by many previous authors (Rose et al, 2003(Rose et al, , 2005. We have shown that the unneutralized magnetic field in the return current layer is responsible for complete stabilization of this particular instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%