Two traditions of cognitive sociology: An analysis and assessment of their cognitive and methodological assumptions

Abstract

Cognitive sociology has been split into cultural and interdisciplinary traditions that position themselves differently in relation to the cognitive sciences and make incompatible assumptions about cognition. This article provides an analysis and assessment of the cognitive and methodological assumptions of these two traditions from the perspective of the mechanistic theory of explanation. We argue that while the cultural tradition of cognitive sociology has provided important descriptions about how human cognition varies across cultural groups and historical periods, it has not opened up the black box of cognitive mechanisms that produce and sustain this variation. This means that its explanations for the described phenomena have remained weak. By contrast, the interdisciplinary tradition of cognitive sociology has sought to integrate cognitive scientific concepts and methods into explanatory research on how culture influences action and how culture is stored in memory. Although we grant that interdisciplinary cognitive sociologists have brought many fresh ideas, concepts and methods to cultural sociology from the cognitive sciences, they have not always clarified their assumptions about cognition and their models have

On the Uses of Phenomenology in Sociological Research: A Typology, some Criticisms and a Plea

“…This ambivalence is pressing within cognitive sociology, and goes back to its two-pronged origins in Zerubavel's (1997) andDiMaggio's (1997) texts. While the former pushes towards a distinctively sociological approach, the latter calls for the strong incorporation of explanatory aspects of psychology into sociological analysis (for a more detailed analysis of this tension RAZA -195 within the field, see Brekhus & Ignatow, 2019; see also Kaidesoja et al, 2022). Recently, scholars taking DiMaggio's route have continued this project of disciplinary integration with the (neuro)cognitive sciences (Cerulo, 2010;Lizardo et al, 2019).…”

Инфраструктура Как Камера-Обскура Социальных Классификаций: Системы Городского Видеонаблюдения В Малых Городах

“…При таком анализе вопрос о биологически обусловленных социальных процессах познания должен быть сознательно отодвинут в сторону. Представители сильных подходов требуют [Kaidesoja, Hyyryläinen, Puustinen, 2022…”

“…Имеется в виду сведение всех причин поведения к социальным механизмам. По мнению некоторых представителей «сильного» подхода, социологизм -один из ключевых недостатков большей части социологической теории вообще[Kaidesoja, Hyyryläinen, Puustinen, 2022].…”

Cognitive Sociology’s three blindspots: decisions, implicit measures and groups

“…Cognitive sociology contains different approaches in considering the relationship between cognition and culture ( Kaidesoja et al, 2022). Much theoretical and methodological reflection is now consolidating, as demonstrated by recent collections of essays (Brekhus and Ignatow, 2019).…”