1988
DOI: 10.1785/bssa0780062025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two types of reservoir-induced seismicity

Abstract: The temporal distribution of induced seismicity following the filling of large reservoirs shows two types of response. At some reservoirs, seismicity begins almost immediately following the first filling of the reservoir. At others, pronounced increases in seismicity are not observed until a number of seasonal filling cycles have passed. These differences in response may correspond to two fundamental mechanisms by which a reservoir can modify the strength of the crust—one related to rapid increases in elastic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 350 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(see e.g. Simpson et al, 1988), may contribute to group events at specific times and places, introducing numerical artifacts in the tidal phase analysis.…”
Section: Other Causes Of Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(see e.g. Simpson et al, 1988), may contribute to group events at specific times and places, introducing numerical artifacts in the tidal phase analysis.…”
Section: Other Causes Of Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the area of the Bucaramanga nest, the presence of dams has raised the question of the possibility of induced seismicity; however, up-to-date there is no evidence of an increase in seismicity that could be related to the dam activity. According to Simpson et al, (1988), the seismicity caused by the activity of dams would be limited to shallow events, approximately up to about 30 km. Most earthquakes in the Bucaramanga nest are of intermediate-depth (> 70 km, e.g.…”
Section: Other Causes Of Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stresses may pose significant risk associated with accelerated deformation, fault reactivation, and possible damage to reservoir seals. Regional increases in seismic activity induced by such dynamic stresses have been reported in numerous studies (e.g., Brodsky & Lajoie, 2013;Davis & Pennington, 1989;Deichmann & Giardini, 2009;Ellsworth, 2013;Frohlich, 2012;Healy et al, 1968;Holland, 2013;Horton, 2012;McGarr et al, 2015;McNamara et al, 2015;Raleigh et al, 1976;Simpson et al, 1988;Sminchak & Gupta, 2003;van der Elst et al, 2013;Walsh & Zoback, 2015;Weingarten et al, 2015;Zoback, 2012;Zoback & Gorelick, 2012). However, in the context of energy recovery, these dynamic stresses may be beneficial in enhancing permeability and have received relatively little attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On land, there are many records of earthquakes caused by reservoir filling, which indicates that water loading has an effect on seismicity [84][85][86]. The same situation may occur in the ocean with the progression of sea-level rise.…”
Section: Seismicitymentioning
confidence: 99%