2019
DOI: 10.1002/tesj.491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two viewpoints of English learner (re)classification: The implications of federal requirements for defining English learners in U.S. schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is hope for a more equitable future for ELLs. Adjusting OCR guidance on classification and reclassification toward the compartment viewpoint (Bond, 2020) is a first step to remain in accordance with the equal opportunities protected by ESSA (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is hope for a more equitable future for ELLs. Adjusting OCR guidance on classification and reclassification toward the compartment viewpoint (Bond, 2020) is a first step to remain in accordance with the equal opportunities protected by ESSA (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies have indicated an ineffectiveness of the classification system (e.g., Abedi, 2008; Callahan, 2005; Mavrogordato & White, 2017; Umansky & Reardon, 2014). Bond (2020) dichotomizes viewpoints on the classification system as compartment or fluid , with the former seeking consistency in classification criteria and the latter allowing for more flexibility. In this article, intended primarily for policymakers, I present an argument in favor of the compartment viewpoint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%