2019
DOI: 10.58680/ccc201930295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Year College Teacher-Scholar-Activism: Reconstructing the Disciplinary Matrix of Writing Studies

Abstract: Two-year college faculty have begun articulating a teacher-scholar-activist professional identity. After tracing the emergence of this concept and calls for solidarity in two-year college writing studies, we draw on two case studies to advocate for cross-sector disciplinary alliances that expand educational opportunity, improve professional equity, and advance social justice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we apply Phelps and Ackerman's (2010) definitional lens for determining disciplinarity, then we can describe the profession of two-year college writing studies as aspirational and incomplete-well established enough to have decades of peer-reviewed scholarship and participation in scholarly activities, such as regional and national conferences, but missing from the sustained attention graduate education provides and, thus, the professionalization in institutional norms and methods of professional regulation (including but not limited to scholarly engagement, faculty collaborative mentoring, and professional service). In fact, we suspect the false dichotomy of "researcher versus teacher"-one teacher-scholar and teacher-scholar-activist movements have aimed to disrupt (Andelora 2005(Andelora , 2013Toth, Sullivan, and Calhoon-Dillahunt 2019)-reinforces the fallacy that two-year college writing instructors "just teach." In this way, "just teaching" most often means working outside of a research setting, regardless of what research, assessment, or advocacy the faculty member who "just teaches" does, thereby suppressing membership and ownership over disciplinary and professional conversations-both by ourselves and by our four-year colleagues.…”
Section: N Ot " J U S T T E a C H I N G " : D I S C I P L I N A R I T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we apply Phelps and Ackerman's (2010) definitional lens for determining disciplinarity, then we can describe the profession of two-year college writing studies as aspirational and incomplete-well established enough to have decades of peer-reviewed scholarship and participation in scholarly activities, such as regional and national conferences, but missing from the sustained attention graduate education provides and, thus, the professionalization in institutional norms and methods of professional regulation (including but not limited to scholarly engagement, faculty collaborative mentoring, and professional service). In fact, we suspect the false dichotomy of "researcher versus teacher"-one teacher-scholar and teacher-scholar-activist movements have aimed to disrupt (Andelora 2005(Andelora , 2013Toth, Sullivan, and Calhoon-Dillahunt 2019)-reinforces the fallacy that two-year college writing instructors "just teach." In this way, "just teaching" most often means working outside of a research setting, regardless of what research, assessment, or advocacy the faculty member who "just teaches" does, thereby suppressing membership and ownership over disciplinary and professional conversations-both by ourselves and by our four-year colleagues.…”
Section: N Ot " J U S T T E a C H I N G " : D I S C I P L I N A R I T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we apply Phelps and Ackerman's (2010) definitional lens for determining disciplinarity, then we can describe the profession of two-year college writing studies as aspirational and incomplete-well established enough to have decades of peer-reviewed scholarship and participation in scholarly activities, such as regional and national conferences, but missing from the sustained attention graduate education provides and, thus, the professionalization in institutional norms and methods of professional regulation (including but not limited to scholarly engagement, faculty collaborative mentoring, and professional service). In fact, we suspect the false dichotomy of "researcher versus teacher"-one teacher-scholar and teacher-scholar-activist movements have aimed to disrupt (Andelora 2005(Andelora , 2013Toth, Sullivan, and Calhoon-Dillahunt 2019)-reinforces the fallacy that two-year college writing instructors "just teach." In this way, "just teaching" most often means working outside of a research setting, regardless of what research, assessment, or advocacy the faculty member who "just teaches" does, thereby suppressing membership and ownership over disciplinary and professional conversations-both by ourselves and by our four-year colleagues.…”
Section: N Ot " J U S T T E a C H I N G " : D I S C I P L I N A R I T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we apply Phelps and Ackerman's (2010) definitional lens for determining disciplinarity, then we can describe the profession of two-year college writing studies as aspirational and incomplete-well established enough to have decades of peer-reviewed scholarship and participation in scholarly activities, such as regional and national conferences, but missing from the sustained attention graduate education provides and, thus, the professionalization in institutional norms and methods of professional regulation (including but not limited to scholarly engagement, faculty collaborative mentoring, and professional service). In fact, we suspect the false dichotomy of "researcher versus teacher"-one teacher-scholar and teacher-scholar-activist movements have aimed to disrupt (Andelora 2005(Andelora , 2013Toth, Sullivan, and Calhoon-Dillahunt 2019)-reinforces the fallacy that two-year college writing instructors "just teach." In this way, "just teaching" most often means working outside of a research setting, regardless of what research, assessment, or advocacy the faculty member who "just teaches" does, thereby suppressing membership and ownership over disciplinary and professional conversations-both by ourselves and by our four-year colleagues.…”
Section: N Ot " J U S T T E a C H I N G " : D I S C I P L I N A R I T...mentioning
confidence: 99%