Two youths who clutter, but is that the only similarity?

Myers, Florence L.; Louis, Kenneth O. St.

doi:10.1016/s0094-730x(96)00032-0

Cited by 16 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Statistical analysis indicated no differences for hesitation, phrase, segment and word repetition. However, the group of AWC showed greater amount of interjection, revision and unfinished word, confirming the findings of a study that examined the disfluencies of two individuals with cluttering 23 . Others researches have also reported the presence of an excess of interjections and revisions 24 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

Frequência e tipologia das disfluências: análise comparativa entre taquifêmicos e gagos

Souza¹,

Paschoalino

Cardoso

et al. 2013

Rev. CEFAC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJETIVO: quantificar e comparar as tipologias das disfluências da fala de adultos com taquifemia e adultos com gagueira desenvolvimental persistente. MÉTODO: participaram 15 adultos, divididos em dois grupos: Grupo de Pessoas com Taquifemia, composto por 5 adultos com taquifemia e Grupo de Pessoas com Gagueira, composto por 10 adultos com gagueira. Os procedimentos utilizados foram: avaliação da fluência, Inventário Preditivo de Taquifemia e Instrumento de Gravidade da Gagueira. RESULTADOS: os grupos apresentaram diferenças estatisticamente significantes para o total de disfluências comuns (p=0,021) e de disfluências gagas (p<0,001). Quanto à tipologia de disfluências comuns, interjeição, revisão e palavra não terminada apresentaram diferenças significantes. Todos os tipos de disfluencias gagas foram manifestados com maior ocorrência no grupo de gagueira, com diferença estatisticamente significante. CONCLUSÃO: o grupo de pessoas com taquifemia apresentou aumento da frequência de disfluencias comuns, enquanto que o grupo de pessoas com gagueira apresentou aumento na frequencia de disfluências gagas. As disfluências comuns foram variadas em ambos os grupos e taquifêmicos mostraram menos tipos de disfluências gagas em relação aos taquifêmicos.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

Frequência e tipologia das disfluências: análise comparativa entre taquifêmicos e gagos

Souza¹,

Paschoalino

Cardoso

et al. 2013

Rev. CEFAC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Results also indicated that disfluency counts in conversation samples for eight disfluency categories (i.e., interjections, revisions, unfinished words, prolongations, phrase repetitions, word repetitions, syllable repetitions, and hesitations) (Myers & St. Louis, 1996;St. Louis, Myers, Faragasso, Townsend, & Gallaher, 2004) were greater for the PWC than the MC, significantly so for revisions, hesitations, and total disfluencies.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 88%

“…Given the differences of opinion concerning cluttering symptoms, existing studies have not offered any standard criteria for diagnosis (e.g., numerous reports on PWC in a special edition of the Journal of Fluency Disorders) (St. Louis, 1996). Recent reports have advanced specific criteria (Bakker, Myers, Raphael, & St. Louis, 2011;St.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Verbal Time Estimation in Cluttering

Garnett¹,

Louis²

2014

CICSD

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Frequency of disfluency clusters might indicate the severity of cluttering (Myers, St. Louis, and Faragasso 2008;Myers et al, 2012). Myers and Louis (1996) analysed the speech of two PWC. They found that there were four times more disfluency clusters in the speech of PWC with more severe cluttering than in the speech of PWC with less severe cluttering.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clustering of disfluencies in typical, fast and cluttered speech

Bóna

2018

Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cluttering is a fluency disorder which can be characterised by excessive disfluencies. However, the low number of studies dealing with the analysis of disfluencies in cluttering show contradictory results. The aim of this article is to analyse disfluency clusters in cluttered, fast and typical speech. Frequency of all disfluency clusters and those complex disfluencies which contain more than two constituents were analysed. The number and types of the constituents of complex disfluencies and the reason of their occurrence were analysed in detail. Results show that complex disfluencies occurred the most frequently in cluttered speech, and the least frequently in exceptionally rapid speech (ERS). Persons who clutter (PWC) had more and much longer complex disfluencies than typical speakers. Complex disfluencies which suggest difficulties in linguistic formulation occurred in cluttering significantly more times than in typical speech. The results bring us closer to understanding why there are perceptually more disfluencies in cluttered speech than in typical one. In addition, they also seem to strengthen the notion that cluttering is a language disorder.

show abstract

Two youths who clutter, but is that the only similarity?

Cited by 16 publications

References 1 publication

Frequência e tipologia das disfluências: análise comparativa entre taquifêmicos e gagos

Frequência e tipologia das disfluências: análise comparativa entre taquifêmicos e gagos

Verbal Time Estimation in Cluttering

Clustering of disfluencies in typical, fast and cluttered speech

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About