Type 0 Ulnar Longitudinal Deficiency

Havenhill, Timothy G.; Manske, Paul R.; Patel, Archit; Goldfarb, Charles A.

doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.07.006

Cited by 31 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…5), congenital radial head dislocation, and coalition of the ulnar carpal bones or metacarpal (►Fig. 5) may be also seen in association with longitudinal postaxial deficiency [20][21][22][23] and may require additional radiographs as for preaxial deficiency. Other bone abnormalities may be encountered such as radial bowing (when the ulna is deficient) (►Fig.…”

Section: Longitudinal Postaxial Deficiencymentioning

confidence: 99%

Congenital Malformations of the Hand and Forearm in Children: What Radiologists Should Know

Aucourt

Budzik

Manouvrier‐Hanu

et al. 2012

Semin Musculoskelet Radiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Congenital upper limb malformations represent complex pathologies because of their varied clinical presentations, imaging features, and etiologies. They can be divided into (1) failure of formation with transverse, intercalary, and longitudinal (preaxial, postaxial, and mesoaxial) deficiencies, (2) failure of differentiation with synostoses, carpal coalitions, syndactylies, and symphalangism, (3) duplication with ulnar dimelia and polydactylies, and (4) brachydactylies. Congenital Madelung's deformity, clinodactyly, camptodactyly, and Kirner's deformity are usually included in these malformations. Despite advances in molecular diagnosis, a good knowledge of clinical and imaging features as well as special consideration of other skeletal or nonskeletal abnormalities are essential to eventually diagnose an embryo fetopathy (maternal valproate treatment, constriction band syndrome), a genetic disorder (trisomy 21 or Down syndrome, Turner's syndrome, Holt-Oram syndrome), or a nongenetic syndrome (vertebral, anal, cardiac, tracheal, esophageal, renal, limb association, Poland's syndrome). Genetic counseling for a child presenting with a congenital upper limb malformation is of great value, both for the treating team and the parents, and imaging is often required. The latter is still largely supported by conventional radiography, both for diagnosis and functional prognosis, but ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging will be great tools in the near future to better evaluate these conditions.

show abstract

Section: Longitudinal Postaxial Deficiencymentioning

confidence: 99%

Congenital Malformations of the Hand and Forearm in Children: What Radiologists Should Know

Aucourt

Budzik

Manouvrier‐Hanu

et al. 2012

Semin Musculoskelet Radiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While all of the categories are similar, the four-category classification of Bayne 67 is generally preferred. Of interest, none of the forearm-and-elbow classifications considers hand abnormalities; to address this limitation, Bayne's forearm and elbow classification has recently been modified 72 to include Type 0. Additionally, as noted in the presentation of radial deficiencies, Goldfarb et al 40 have added Type V to include those phocomelic extremities with characteristics suggestive of ulnar longitudinal deficiency.…”

Section: Forearm and Elbowmentioning

confidence: 99%

Classification and Developmental Biology of Congenital Anomalies of the Hand and Upper Extremity

Manske

Oberg

2009

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Havenhill et al 19 added type 0 to include patients with normal elbow and forearms and abnormalities of the hand and carpus, whereas Goldfarb et al 20 added type V ( Table 2). Of the 13 patient studied with type 0 ULD, 3 had complete absence of the small finger ray, 6 had absence of both the small and ring rays, and 4 had hypoplasia of the small finger, 3 with a synostosis of the ring-small metacarpal.…”

Section: Ulnar Longitudinal Deficiency (Uld)mentioning

confidence: 99%