Types of outcomes in factional rivalries: Lessons from non-democratic parties in Turkey

Abstract

In non-democratic parties, oppositional factions have difficulty making inroads to the top executive party organs. There are two consequences for these groups: party split or leadership removal. In the former case, the oppositional faction exits and establishes its own party. In the latter, the opposition succeeds in altering the balance of power by removing the leader and the party goes through change. This article suggests that the level of power concentration within the dominant faction matters for the type of outcome in factional rivalries. If the power is concentrated in the hands of a small elite, the divisions within the elite can help the oppositional faction remove the party leader. If the power resides only with a single leader, the oppositional faction is likely to lose the struggle against the dominant faction and decide to exit. This study explores the causal mechanisms involved by comparing six non-democratic parties from Turkey.

Discursive Institutionalism as Framework of Analysis for Multi-Vector Power Relations in Organizing Political Parties

“…This is in line with the new institutional views derived from Panebianco and Randall-Svåsand's institutional views which incorporate external elements (Calise, 2015). The struggle for existence in these institutions encourages political actors to compete with and influence each other in political party institutions (Ayan Musil & Dikici Bilgin, 2016;Scarrow et al, 2017). Political parties are also considered as a collective unit where inter-individual coalition and elite groups struggle to reach the top position (Lane & Preker, 2018).…”

Regime cycles and political change in African autocracies

“…This collective elite organisation references the leverage that is a central determinant in how regimes engage in the accommodation process. The central assumption is that a faction can ‘achieve reforms through changing the balance of power in the party … with strategies based on open collective mobilization’ (Ayan Musil & Dikici Bilgin 2016). Factions take advantage of opportunities to advance the hierarchy, thereby fracturing the coalition.…”