“…(a) NGRIP Greenland ice core δ 18 O on extended GICC05 timescale (Rasmussen et al, 2006), red line is smoothed at 1 %; (b) δ 18 O from Cave of the Bells (Wagner et al, 2010); (c) vein calcite δ 18 O from Devils Hole, Nevada (Winograd et al, 2006); (d) Alkenone SST proxy from Ocean Drilling Program sites 1012 (Liu et al, 2005) and 2020 (Liu, 2004); (e) reconstructed relative ΔP-ET (%) from Maher et al, (in prep) pink, Newark Valley; dark blue, Diamond Valley; light blue, Fish Lake Valley; purple, Yucca Mountain. (f) January and July insolation for 40˚N calculated using the program of (Laskar et al, 2004); (g) SPECMAP δ 18 O record (Martinson et al, 1987); (h) Chewaucan Basin relative lake level curve from sediment cores (Licciardi, 2001) and 230 Th-U dated tufa samples (this study); (i) Lake Surprise lake level fluctuations from 230 Th-U dated tufa samples (this study), BSE detrital corrected ages only; (j) and (k) Lake Lahontan, NV and Lake Bonneville, UT relative lake levels (Compiled by Brook et al, 2006, from McCoy, 1987Oviatt et al, 1987;Benson et al, 1990;Oviatt et al, 1992); (e) Lake Manly, CA lake level (m) (Ku et al, 1998); (f) Searles Lake, CA relative lake level (Smith, 1984); (i) Babicora Basin, Mexico relative lake level (Metcalfe et al, 2002). The radiocarbon dated lake level curves ((h), (j), (k), (i), (m) and (n)) have substantial error and uncertainty due to the necessary 14 C dead carbon correction and the radiocarbon to calendar age conversion uncertainty, particularly after the LGM due to plateaus in the calibration curve.…”