1998
DOI: 10.1006/qres.1998.1995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U-Series Chronology of Lacustrine Deposits in Death Valley, California

Abstract: Uranium-series dating on a 186-m core (DV93-1) drilled from Badwater Basin in Death Valley, California, and on calcareous tufas from nearby strandlines shows that Lake Manly, the lake that periodically flooded Death Valley during the late Pleistocene, experienced large fluctuations in depth and chemistry over the last 200,000 yr. Death Valley has been occupied by a long-standing deep lake, perennial shallow saline lakes, and a desiccated salt pan similar to the modern valley floor. The average sedimentation ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) NGRIP Greenland ice core δ 18 O on extended GICC05 timescale (Rasmussen et al, 2006), red line is smoothed at 1 %; (b) δ 18 O from Cave of the Bells (Wagner et al, 2010); (c) vein calcite δ 18 O from Devils Hole, Nevada (Winograd et al, 2006); (d) Alkenone SST proxy from Ocean Drilling Program sites 1012 (Liu et al, 2005) and 2020 (Liu, 2004); (e) reconstructed relative ΔP-ET (%) from Maher et al, (in prep) pink, Newark Valley; dark blue, Diamond Valley; light blue, Fish Lake Valley; purple, Yucca Mountain. (f) January and July insolation for 40˚N calculated using the program of (Laskar et al, 2004); (g) SPECMAP δ 18 O record (Martinson et al, 1987); (h) Chewaucan Basin relative lake level curve from sediment cores (Licciardi, 2001) and 230 Th-U dated tufa samples (this study); (i) Lake Surprise lake level fluctuations from 230 Th-U dated tufa samples (this study), BSE detrital corrected ages only; (j) and (k) Lake Lahontan, NV and Lake Bonneville, UT relative lake levels (Compiled by Brook et al, 2006, from McCoy, 1987Oviatt et al, 1987;Benson et al, 1990;Oviatt et al, 1992); (e) Lake Manly, CA lake level (m) (Ku et al, 1998); (f) Searles Lake, CA relative lake level (Smith, 1984); (i) Babicora Basin, Mexico relative lake level (Metcalfe et al, 2002). The radiocarbon dated lake level curves ((h), (j), (k), (i), (m) and (n)) have substantial error and uncertainty due to the necessary 14 C dead carbon correction and the radiocarbon to calendar age conversion uncertainty, particularly after the LGM due to plateaus in the calibration curve.…”
Section: Recordsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(a) NGRIP Greenland ice core δ 18 O on extended GICC05 timescale (Rasmussen et al, 2006), red line is smoothed at 1 %; (b) δ 18 O from Cave of the Bells (Wagner et al, 2010); (c) vein calcite δ 18 O from Devils Hole, Nevada (Winograd et al, 2006); (d) Alkenone SST proxy from Ocean Drilling Program sites 1012 (Liu et al, 2005) and 2020 (Liu, 2004); (e) reconstructed relative ΔP-ET (%) from Maher et al, (in prep) pink, Newark Valley; dark blue, Diamond Valley; light blue, Fish Lake Valley; purple, Yucca Mountain. (f) January and July insolation for 40˚N calculated using the program of (Laskar et al, 2004); (g) SPECMAP δ 18 O record (Martinson et al, 1987); (h) Chewaucan Basin relative lake level curve from sediment cores (Licciardi, 2001) and 230 Th-U dated tufa samples (this study); (i) Lake Surprise lake level fluctuations from 230 Th-U dated tufa samples (this study), BSE detrital corrected ages only; (j) and (k) Lake Lahontan, NV and Lake Bonneville, UT relative lake levels (Compiled by Brook et al, 2006, from McCoy, 1987Oviatt et al, 1987;Benson et al, 1990;Oviatt et al, 1992); (e) Lake Manly, CA lake level (m) (Ku et al, 1998); (f) Searles Lake, CA relative lake level (Smith, 1984); (i) Babicora Basin, Mexico relative lake level (Metcalfe et al, 2002). The radiocarbon dated lake level curves ((h), (j), (k), (i), (m) and (n)) have substantial error and uncertainty due to the necessary 14 C dead carbon correction and the radiocarbon to calendar age conversion uncertainty, particularly after the LGM due to plateaus in the calibration curve.…”
Section: Recordsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, the timing of fluctuations during past lake cycles can be determined by dating beach deposits such as tufa (Ku et al, 1998;Garnet et al, 2004) and studying lake sediment cores (e.g. Licciardi et al, 2000;Zic et al, 2002).…”
Section: Late Pleistocene Pluvial Lakes In Western North Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations