2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14030456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UAV and GPR Data Integration in Glacier Geometry Reconstruction: A Case Study from Irenebreen, Svalbard

Abstract: Although measurements of thickness and internal structure of glaciers are substantial for the understanding of their evolution and response to climate change, detailed data about polythermal glaciers, are scarce. Here, we present the first ground-penetrating radar (GPR) measurement data of Irenebreen, and high-resolution DEM and orthomosaic, obtained from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry. A combination of GPR and UAV data allowed for the reconstruction of the glacier geometry including thermal stru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present tectonic framework of the basin is the result of the late Indosinian movements [20]. The basin developed over 200 m of Lower Jurassic braided river deposits in unconformable contact with the underlying Paleozoic marine strata and is overlain by Middle to Upper Jurassic lacustrine deposits [21]. The fluvial deposits in the studied outcrop area are located between the mountain range in the northwest and the lacustrine basin in the southeast, and the braided river extends from the alluvial fan to the middle of the basin, 20 km away from the northwest mountain range and more than 100 km away from the southeast lake [22].…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present tectonic framework of the basin is the result of the late Indosinian movements [20]. The basin developed over 200 m of Lower Jurassic braided river deposits in unconformable contact with the underlying Paleozoic marine strata and is overlain by Middle to Upper Jurassic lacustrine deposits [21]. The fluvial deposits in the studied outcrop area are located between the mountain range in the northwest and the lacustrine basin in the southeast, and the braided river extends from the alluvial fan to the middle of the basin, 20 km away from the northwest mountain range and more than 100 km away from the southeast lake [22].…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The fluvial deposits in the studied outcrop area are located between the mountain range in the northwest and the lacustrine basin in the southeast, and the braided river extends from the alluvial fan to the middle of the basin, 20 km away from the northwest mountain range and more than 100 km away from the southeast lake [22]. The Yungang Formation is divided into three lithologic members, which are the Conglomerate Member, the Rockcave Member and the Mudstone Member from bottom to top [21,22]. The Conglomerate Member contains grey conglomerate intercalated sandstone, with a thickness of less than 40 m. The Rockcave Member comprises red coarse sandstone and a small amount of red mudstone.…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is slightly smaller than the uncertainty of ±0.008 m ns −1 assumed by Lapazaran et al (2016), as they applied it to polythermal ice. This uncertainty could be further reduced by measuring the propagation velocity on-site by conducting CMP measurements (Bradford and Harper, 2005) or by analyzing the shape of diffraction hyperbolas in the GPR data (Karušs et al, 2022). This was not possible in our case, because CMP measurements have to be conducted on the ground, whereas no clean diffraction hyperbolas were present in our data.…”
Section: Ice Thickness Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the processing of the timedependent gain, the Background removal and Ormsby bandpass filters were used. To determine the EM wave propagation speed, a common midpoint method (CMP) was applied (Karušs et al, 2021(Karušs et al, , 2022Karušs & B erzin ¸š, 2015;Neal, 2004) using a 300 MHz antenna as a transmitter and a 500 MHz antenna as a receiver. The exact positions of the CMP measurement points were chosen using common offset radargrams.…”
Section: Gpr Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%