Über den Aufbau des Gesichtsschädels beim Deckbiß

Korkhaus, G.

doi:10.1007/bf02169982

Cited by 19 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Karlsen [27], the chin in patients with Angle Class II, Division 2 is overdeveloped, while the mandibular body is underdeveloped with a retroclined symphysis. Other authors [2,20,31] state a developmental inhibition of the alveolar process, but not of the entire mandibular body. A prominent chin in patients with Angle Class II, Division 2 was also described by Peck et al [40].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nach Karlsen [27] ist bei Patienten mit Angle-Klasse II,2 das Kinn überentwickelt, während der Corpus mandibulae unterentwickelt und die Symphyse retroinkliniert ist. Nach Ansicht anderer Autoren [2,20,31] kommt es bei Patienten mit Angle-Klasse II,2 zu einer stärkeren Wachstumshemmung des Processus alveolaris, nicht aber des gesamten Corpus mandibulae. Ein prominentes Kinn bei Patienten mit AngleKlasse II,2 wurde auch von Peck et al [40] angegeben.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…Eine deutliche Verkürzung der unteren vorderen Gesichtshöhe bei Patienten mit Angle-Klasse II,1 [10,38] oder II,2 [28,31,33,38,39,50,51] wurde von mehreren Autoren Several authors demonstrated a marked reduction in lower facial height in patients with Angle Class II, Division 1 [10,38] or Division 2 [28,31,33,38,39,50,51]. In contrast, other authors report no significant changes in upper or lower anterior facial height in patients with Angle Class II, Division 1 [45] or Division 2 [18,25,48].…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Determining Skeletal Parameters in Angle Classes II, Division 1 and II, Division 2*

Lisson

Pyka

2005

J Orofac Orthop

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Significant differences existed in skeletal morphology between patients with Angle Class II, Division 1 and II, Division 2, with only minor gender-specific differences: angleML/NSL in Class II, Division 2 males (p < 0.01) and females (p < 0.05) was smaller compared to Class II, Division 1 patients. angleML/NL was also noticeably smaller in Class II, Division 2 males (p < 0.001) and females (p < 0.01) compared to Class II, Division 1 patients. Patients with Class II, Division 2 had a smaller gonial angle (angleArGoMe), with the difference being significant only in males (p < 0.05).

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Determining Skeletal Parameters in Angle Classes II, Division 1 and II, Division 2*

Lisson

Pyka

2005

J Orofac Orthop

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Numerous investigations indicate a relatively strong genetic determination of cover-bite [7,9,17,18,26,28,32,34]. A retroclined position of the upper central incisor germs, a reduced width of the upper in relation to the lower incisors, and increased lip pressure have been discussed in the literature as etiologic factors underlying retroclination of the upper central incisors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Zahlreiche Untersuchungen weisen auf eine relativ starke genetische Determination des Deckbisses hin [7,9,17,18,26,28,32,34]. Als ätiologische Faktoren für die Retroinklination der mittleren oberen Schneidezähne wurden in der Literatur eine retroinklinierte Stellung der entsprechenden Zahnkeime vor dem Durchbruch, eine in Relation zu den unteren reduzierte Breite der oberen Frontzähne, sowie ein erhöhter Lippendruck diskutiert.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

A Retrospective Cephalometric Study for the Quantitative Assessment of Relapse Factors in Cover-Bite Treatment

et al. 2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The average relapse was ca. 20% of the total correction of the anterior linguoversion and deep bite, with the relapse tendency, however, displaying substantial interindividual variations. Multiple regression analysis revealed an increased relapse tendency in specific cases: patients with maxillary extractions, cases with a pronounced therapeutically induced change of upper central incisor inclination, and patients with a high post-therapeutic LipL or with poor compliance in the retention phase. In view of the relatively good opportunity to influence the level of the LipL therapeutically, one of the most important therapeutic objectives for cover-bite patients should be to reduce the amount by which the lower lip overlaps the upper incisors ( to a maximum value of 3 mm). This can be achieved by active mechanical intrusion of the upper incisors. If the orthodontist fails to take account of this aspect when planning or performing the treatment, he has to accept an increased risk of relapse.

show abstract

Early Treatment of Cover-Bite and Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

Lapatki

2022

Clinical Cases in Early Orthodontic Treatment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Über den Aufbau des Gesichtsschädels beim Deckbiß

Cited by 19 publications

References 0 publications

Determining Skeletal Parameters in Angle Classes II, Division 1 and II, Division 2*

Determining Skeletal Parameters in Angle Classes II, Division 1 and II, Division 2*

A Retrospective Cephalometric Study for the Quantitative Assessment of Relapse Factors in Cover-Bite Treatment

Early Treatment of Cover-Bite and Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About