1926
DOI: 10.1002/cber.19260590524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Über den fermentativen Abbau der Stärke durch »Biolase«. (Beiträge zur Chemie der Stärke, XVI)

Abstract: gg6 P r i n g s h e i m , Sc h u p i r o : Fermentativer Abbau der. Starke Dahrg. .59 167. Hans Pringsheim und Eugen Schapiro: ifber den fermentativen Abbau der S t b k e durcth .Biolaeec:. (Beitriige zur Chemie der Stiirke, XVI1.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1926
1926
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…macerans mainly led to the elaboration of a possible interpretation of the chemical structure of amylose and of amylopectin. For Pringsheim, the Schardinger dextrins arose through the bacterial depolymerization of starch to the fundamental units: the amylose fraction being broken down into the α-series of dextrins (polyamyloses) and the amylopectin fraction being degraded to the β-series. For over 20 years, Pringsheim and his various collaborators (Alfred Langhans, Franz Eissler, Stefanie Lichtenstein, Walter Persch, Diamandi Dernikos, Kurt Goldstein, Arthur Beiser, Arnold Steingroever, Alfred Wiener, Alexander Weidinger, Eugen Schapiro, James Irvine, Paul Meyersohn) penned an abundant literature on their studies of dextrins, although the studies suffered from numerous errors due to the use of dextrins that were not pure and to problems arising from separation of the fractions and from the use of unsuitable analytical methods (e.g., determination of the masses by cryoscopy). It results that Pringsheim’s copious results are difficult to exploit.…”
Section: The Period Of Doubt: 1911–1935mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…macerans mainly led to the elaboration of a possible interpretation of the chemical structure of amylose and of amylopectin. For Pringsheim, the Schardinger dextrins arose through the bacterial depolymerization of starch to the fundamental units: the amylose fraction being broken down into the α-series of dextrins (polyamyloses) and the amylopectin fraction being degraded to the β-series. For over 20 years, Pringsheim and his various collaborators (Alfred Langhans, Franz Eissler, Stefanie Lichtenstein, Walter Persch, Diamandi Dernikos, Kurt Goldstein, Arthur Beiser, Arnold Steingroever, Alfred Wiener, Alexander Weidinger, Eugen Schapiro, James Irvine, Paul Meyersohn) penned an abundant literature on their studies of dextrins, although the studies suffered from numerous errors due to the use of dextrins that were not pure and to problems arising from separation of the fractions and from the use of unsuitable analytical methods (e.g., determination of the masses by cryoscopy). It results that Pringsheim’s copious results are difficult to exploit.…”
Section: The Period Of Doubt: 1911–1935mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pringsheim confirmed that the simplest means to distinguish between the α-and β-dextrins were the iodine reaction (Pringsheim 1922;Pringsheim and Dernikos 1922). Pringsheim was the first to study the halogen complexes of dextrins (Pringsheim and Wolfsohn 1924;Pringsheim and Schapiro 1926). The first methylated β-dextrin was also obtained by his group: 43.6% of degree of methylation as against 45.6% required by theory.…”
Section: Cyclodextrin Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…MD simulations : The poses in the two crystal structures with best Induced Fit Score were subjected to molecular dynamics simulations using Desmond 4.2 266 . The receptor was immersed in the DPPC bilayer.…”
Section: Cancer Delivery Of Quercetin Through Ph Responsive Calixarene-goldmentioning
confidence: 99%