b Some sources of error in mass spectrometry have been investigated. It is concluded that with the proper development, calibration, and photometry procedures and by applying the appropriate corrections for ion mass and energy, photographic detectors can be used in mass spectroscopy with reasonable accuracy. The large errors that are experienced in solids mass spectrometry probably originate in the spark ion source. A number of processes occur simultaneously in the spark source and contribute in unknown proportions to the total error. This source must be studied further before it can be used for quantitative trace analysis.N THE early 1930's collaboration I between F. W. Aston and the Ilford Co.'s laboratories resulted in the production of the Ilford Q plates. The Q emulsion is made in three types (13): &I, low speed, small grain, and high contrast; Qz, intermediate in speed, grain size, and contrast; and Q, high speed, large grain, and low contrast. Good results have been achieved using the Q1 emulsion for isotope abundance measurements (I@, but the Q2 emulsion, because of its greater speed and intermediate granularity, has been the most widely used emulsion for general analytical mass spectrometry. A recent comparison of several emulsions by Rudloff ($1) indicates that Eastman SWR emulsion may be equal to or better than any of the Ilford Q emulsions. The SWR plates combine the high sensitivity a t low exposures of the &, emulsion with the steeper slope of the calibration curve characteristic of the Q1 emulsion. The work reported in the present paper was done entirely with Ilford Q 2 emulsion.
PHOTOGRAPHIC DETECTIONEmulsion and Development Uniformity. The uniformity of photographic response over the total surface of a plate depends on both the uniformity of the emulsion applied to the plates and the ability of the experimenter to develop equally all portions of the emulsion. To minimize the photographic development variations, a mechanical developer (18) was built which provides uniform agitation and good temperature control during a carefully timed photoprocessing procedure.With this equipment, the combined effects of emulsion and development variations were shown to be 5% or less. Since this variation results not only from the nonuniformity of the emulsion but also from errors in making replicate exposures, the nonuniformity of the development process, and errors of densitometry, it is felt that the variation in emulsion uniformity is probably smaller than the total variation, although the possibility of compensating errors must be acknowledged. Thus it appears that emulsion nonuniformity makes only a small contribution to the over-all analytical error.