1908
DOI: 10.1007/bf01677299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Über Interferenzen zwischen zwei schwachen Reizen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1929
1929
1956
1956

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nitrous acid is the compound which oxidizes and is reduced primarily, nitric acid is reduced only secondarily by the reaction with nitric oxide obtained by reduction of nitrous acid. In the absence of nitrous acid therefore, nitric acid cannot easily be reduced by cathodic treatment and the current then reduces the passivating invisible surface oxide (3,4). In contrast, in the presence of nitrous acid the current will reduce nitric acid and therefore will be less effective in activating the passive wire.…”
Section: Refractory Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrous acid is the compound which oxidizes and is reduced primarily, nitric acid is reduced only secondarily by the reaction with nitric oxide obtained by reduction of nitrous acid. In the absence of nitrous acid therefore, nitric acid cannot easily be reduced by cathodic treatment and the current then reduces the passivating invisible surface oxide (3,4). In contrast, in the presence of nitrous acid the current will reduce nitric acid and therefore will be less effective in activating the passive wire.…”
Section: Refractory Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kries & Sewall (1881), Gildemeister (1908), Lucas (1910), Rushton (1932), Katz (1937), and others reported the time-course of excitability changes, whereas Hodgkin (1937Hodgkin ( , 1938, Hodgkin & Rushton (1946), Katz (1947), and others analysed the course of local potential changes following application of currents.…”
Section: Membrane Time Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The testing stimulus has been somewhat above maximal strength so that its effectiveness would not be diminished by the post-cathodal depression that follows just-subliminal stimulation of nerve by brief shocks (cf. Gildermeister, 1908;Erlanger & Blair, 1931). …”
Section: Triphasic Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%