Protein degradation by eukaryotic proteasomes is a multistep process involving substrate recognition, ATP-dependent unfolding, translocation into the proteolytic core particle, and finally proteolysis. To date, most investigations of proteasome function have focused on the first and the last steps in this process. Here we examine the relationship between the stability of a folded protein domain and its degradation rate. Test proteins were targeted to the proteasome independently of ubiquitination by directly tethering them to the protease. Degradation kinetics were compared for test protein pairs whose stability was altered by either point mutation or ligand binding, but were otherwise identical. In both intact cells and in reactions using purified proteasomes and substrates, increased substrate stability led to an increase in substrate turnover time. The steadystate time for degradation ranged from ϳ5 min (dihydrofolate reductase) to 40 min (I27 domain of titin). ATP turnover was 110/min./proteasome, and was not markedly changed by substrate. Proteasomes engage tightly folded substrates in multiple iterative rounds of ATP hydrolysis, a process that can be ratelimiting for degradation.To degrade folded proteins, chambered protease complexes unfold substrates in an energy-dependent manner that requires two components (1). The first, a regulatory complex, recognizes substrates and initiates their processing. The second, an associated proteolytic complex, contains sites at which peptide bonds are hydrolyzed. These sites are present in a closed chamber sequestered from the general cellular environment. The proteolytic chamber is accessed through a pore that excludes folded protein domains but accommodates an unfolded or unstructured polypeptide (2, 3). Regulatory and catalytic complexes must thus collaborate to degrade native proteins: the regulatory complex actively unfolds substrates containing structured domains and translocates them into the catalytic complex. Substrate unfolding and translocation by bacterial ATP-dependent proteases has been extensively studied. It was found that substrate unfolding can be rate-limiting for degradation and that increased mechanical stability of substrates prolongs degradation (4). Is that also true of eukaryotic proteasomes? Studies from our laboratory (5, 6) and by others (7-10) are consistent with this conclusion, but studies using purified proteasomes and substrates of well-defined structure have been limited and have not determined the kinetic parameters associated with proteasome action.There are several requirements for rigorously performing such an analysis. Homogeneous substrates must be available that differ in their resistance to unfolding, but are otherwise identical in structure and proteasomal interaction. Most substrates are designated for destruction by the conjugation of ubiquitin chains, which provide a high affinity tag for proteasome association, but some substrates utilize alternate tags to designate degradation (11,12). Capture of ubiquitin chains and their...