2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-016-9487-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ubiquitous mobile educational data management by teachers, students and parents: Does technology change school-family communication and parental involvement?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0
12

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
26
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This perception is consistent with other studies (Thompson et al, 2015), which revealed that convenience is the primary reason why parents and teachers choose e-mails to communicate certain issues, highlighting the non-necessity to coordinate their busy work schedules. Further, our study reinforces the idea supported by many authors (Blau & Hameiri, 2017;Ho et al, 2013;Olmstead, 2013) that digital communication is perceived as more convenient and more immediate than traditional outreach models, so in some instances it could be a suitable option.…”
Section: Self-efficacysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This perception is consistent with other studies (Thompson et al, 2015), which revealed that convenience is the primary reason why parents and teachers choose e-mails to communicate certain issues, highlighting the non-necessity to coordinate their busy work schedules. Further, our study reinforces the idea supported by many authors (Blau & Hameiri, 2017;Ho et al, 2013;Olmstead, 2013) that digital communication is perceived as more convenient and more immediate than traditional outreach models, so in some instances it could be a suitable option.…”
Section: Self-efficacysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Además, y quizás como consecuencia de esta dinámica unidireccional, las familias consideran estas reuniones repetitivas y prescindibles en los ciclos superiores (Garreta, 2015). Por último, los correos electrónicos y las plataformas digitales, si bien tienen un potencial enorme por considerarse herramientas más eficaces, eficientes e inmediatas (Blau y Hameiri, 2017;Olmstead, 2013), son medios cuyo uso está aún poco extendido. Ambos agentes siguen prefiriendo los canales tradicionales para comunicarse (Macia, 2018;Palomares, 2015), siendo las tutorías, la agenda, las reuniones grupales, las circulares y los contactos informales los medios más utilizados en la mayoría de escuelas (García et al, 2010).…”
Section: Canales De Comunicación Familia-escuelaunclassified
“…While digital empowerment and social inclusion are usually approached separately, recent inquiries suggest the need for exploring good practices of treating them together. For example, educators may catalyse families' digital literacy by strengthening ties between school and family (Arrow-Finch, 2013;Blau-Hameiri, 2016).…”
Section: Digital Literacy and Social Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%